My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2006 Packets
>
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 7:23:10 PM
Creation date
5/13/2022 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
04/13/2006
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4,2006 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 City Administrator Heitke stated staff would capture from the tape what has been said <br /> �-� 2 and send it to Decision Resources, Inc. so they can respond to the concerns about the <br /> 3 proposed question. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Ms.Barbara Bor,resident of Lino Lakes, came forward and read a letter she drafted <br /> 6 regarding the library question. She noted the letter would be sent to all of the County <br /> 7 Commissioners. The letter outlined the benefits of having a public library within the <br /> 8 City. She also indicated her family may donate land for the project. She asked that the <br /> 9 library question on the survey not be area specific. <br /> 10 <br /> i l Council directed staff to take the library question back to the Library Board with <br /> 12 comments regarding the question being area specific. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 City Administrator Heitke distributed an email from the Chair of the Environmental <br /> 15 Board requesting that they or the Environmental Board's staff review and have input on <br /> 16 the survey questions. The Council agreed that other advisory boards were not involved in <br /> 17 the survey and that the Council had already approved the survey. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Community Development Director Grochala advised there are several questions on the <br /> 20 survey that relate to environmental issues. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 City Administrator Heitke reiterated the fact that in early discussions,Decision Resources <br /> 23 had inquired about whether there were any big issues that might come up that could sway <br /> 24 the results of the survey and they like to time surveys to avoid this. He stated that <br /> 25 Decision Resources was aware of the guest editorial in the Pioneer Press and he did send <br /> 26 articles from the newspaper regarding the survey, growth issues, stadium issue, and the <br /> 27 letter to the editor on growth and suggesting how to respond to the survey. Decision <br /> 28 Resources knows that the City does not want to delay the survey, so they may add a <br /> 29 qualifying statement to the survey report that the results may have been affected by pre- <br /> 30 survey publicity. City Administrator Heitke added that people have been requesting <br /> 31 copies of the survey and since it is public data, he has to provide it. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Mayor Bergeson called for a short break at 8:56 p.m. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 9:14 p.m. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 2006 ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Council Appointments—Mayor Bergeson advised the Council needs to finalize the <br /> 40 recommended appointments. <br /> 41 The Council reviewed the appointments and made the following changes: <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Acting Mayor Councilmember O'Donnell <br /> 44 Centennial Fire Steering Councilmember Carlson and Reinert <br /> 45 County Corrections Program Councilmember Stoltz <br /> l►. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.