My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2006 Packets
>
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 7:23:10 PM
Creation date
5/13/2022 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
04/13/2006
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 23, 2006 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 104 Community Development Director Grochala commented that the Environmental Board and the <br /> 405 Planning and Zoning Board noticed that even though they are slowing down growth with the growth <br /> 406 management plan, they are not really permitting the kind of growth that the City would want. He <br /> 407 stated the developer has walked through the process with us for two years, and this is the kick off to <br /> 408 what will need to be done over the next few years. He indicated there will be a lot of tough decisions <br /> 409 over the next six months,but he wants to make it clear that this did not just happen without a lot of <br /> 410 thought and a lot of input from the community <br /> 411 <br /> 412 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-153 approving amendment of the <br /> 413 Comprehensive Plan to amend the proposed land use map,request 370 acres of MUSA, and amend <br /> 414 text with the changes outlined by staff. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. <br /> 415 <br /> 416 Councilmember Carlson expressed continued concern about the amount of development being <br /> 417 proposed. She read a letter from Centerville indicating they have reservations on the development, <br /> 418 and would like to delay development until CSAH 14 improvement is underway. She commented that <br /> 419 as was mentioned, they did just approve this Comprehensive Plan in 2003. She stated she would <br /> 420 support a new review,but that is a different process than the process this took, and requires a citizen <br /> 421 review. <br /> 422 <br /> 423 Councilmember Reinert noted there was a citizen survey done a few years back, and there is a new <br /> 424 one being done, and while growth was one issue, taxes were another. He stated the people want a <br /> 425 diversification of the tax base, as well as places to shop within the city. He noted this development <br /> 426 provides nine miles of trails, and 70 to 8.0.acres of open space. He stated that the letter from <br /> 427 Centerville City Council was from one of their members, and.not from the Council as a whole. He <br /> 428 commented that the cities around them are adding hundreds of homes per year, and if they go even to <br /> 429 247 units he thinks that is still conservative. <br /> 430 <br /> 431 Councilmember Carlson clarified that the letter from Centerville indicates that the Planning <br /> 432 Commission and the City Council reviewed the Comprehensive Plan amendment. She stated that <br /> 433 because it is signed by the mayor, she thinks it is a letter from Centerville, not a single City Council <br /> 434 member. She indicated she stands by the numbers she quoted and her concern about the level of <br /> 435 growth and the pressures that will be placed on them concerning other areas of the city. <br /> 436 <br /> 437 City Administrator Heitke indicated that the letter form Centerville was discussed at the work session, <br /> 438 and he has responded. He indicated that to be fair since the letter was read into the record, they need <br /> 439 to hear staff response. <br /> 440 <br /> 441 Community Development Director Grochala stated that he has responded to the letter and has <br /> 442 discussed the proposal with them, and after explaining this was not approval of a project,but only a <br /> 443 Comprehensive Plan amendment, they were perfectly comfortable with it. He stated that both cities <br /> 444 are concerned with the need for improvement of several roads in conjunction with this project. <br /> 445 <br /> 446 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated that there are a lot of facts and figures. He stated that one <br /> ,-� 147 weekend he tried to get a grasp on this, and contacted several members of the Environmental Board, <br /> 448 speaking with three. He indicated they were all supportive of this project. He stated they knew there <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.