Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br /> October 11, 2001 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Commissioner Carlson stated the City Administrator did indicate she does not want a specific <br /> term for the Finance Director so the Council has the option. <br /> Chair Sullivan stated he also wants to do right by the authors of the Charter. <br /> Motion carried with Commissioner's Dahl, Zastrow, Aldentaler and DeMotts voting no. <br /> MOTION by Commissioner Trehus, seconded by Commissioner Christopherson,to authorize the <br /> Committee to give a proposal to the League of Minnesota Cities to write Option B if Option B is <br /> appropriate. <br /> Chair Sullivan suggested the letter from the City Attorney be attached to the letter being written <br /> to the League of Minnesota Cities. The response should then be brought back to the next <br /> meeting for discussion. <br /> Commissioner Bening stated he wants both options sent to them for an opinion. <br /> Commissioner Carlson stated he likes both options. Again he asked if there is any way to change <br /> the wording of Option B so the City Attorney agrees with it. He stated he is concerned that the <br /> Commission state what it is doing. <br /> Commissioner Trehus indicated he will rephrase Option B. <br /> Commissioner Montain added a friendly amendment to the motion to include that the Committee <br /> should be allowed to spend a maximum of$300 to get an opinion from the League of Minnesota <br /> Cities. That opinion should be brought back to the January 2002 meeting that includes what <br /> questions were asked. <br /> Commissioner Trehus and Commission Christopherson agreed to the amendment. <br /> MOTION carried with Commissioner Bening voting no. <br /> Chair Sullivan advised the Committee to inform the City Clerk they will be contacting the <br /> League of Minnesota Cities. <br /> Five Year Plan Review (Vice-Chair Montain)—Commissioner Montain stated he has talked to <br /> the Finance Director regarding this issue. Staff is discussing the Plan but at this point it mainly <br /> consists of the CIP. He stated he is disappointed that the Plan was not a bigger part of the budget <br /> process. He suggested that the next time they have a joint meeting, the Commission request a <br /> copy of the Plan. He stated the Commission needs to push the Council more regarding this issue <br /> and the Council needs to be held accountable. He added he doesn't think staff had time to fully <br /> address the Plan and it was a bit overwhelming. The Commission needs to get it through to the <br /> Council that it has to get done. <br /> 5 <br />