Laserfiche WebLink
2 1/19/72 <br />Mr. Locher advised it would not be necessary to alter our ordinance. The <br />state code reempts it. He did suggest there are some items that beer <br />checking. It was advised that the Clerk make copies of this code available <br />to the Council, Planner, Engineer and P&Z members and herself. <br />8:30 continued Hearing on Forrest Tagg rezoning request. The affidavits <br />of Publication and Affidavits of Mailing of Notices to owners of parcels <br />within 300 feet are on file. This hearing was begun at the December meeting <br />of P&Z. The Council laid it over to the January 24th meeting. On Jan. 18, <br />1972, the Clerk received a call from Mrs. Tagg stating they wouldn4t be here <br />for the P&Z meeting this Jan. 19th, but they wanted to be put on for Feb. <br />Mr. McLean read a letter from Mr. Van Housen, dated January 11, 1972, in <br />which he outlined that the least of Mr. Tagg's problems were his ten plans <br />not being submitted on time. He totally failed to read or comply with the <br />original 21Rt•C Ordinance and now Section 5.03. Mr. Van Housen's general <br />comment was: "A request for rezoning on the total parcel of land and only a <br />portion of it was drawn end submitted. The most valuable corner in the <br />Village - put together in a very unsatisfactory and detrimental manner for <br />the village.' <br />Mr. Gvtwald stated that Mr. Tagg's biggest error is that he just hadn't <br />identified everything that had to be done. Mr. Tagg had informed him that <br />he was getting things put together now. Mr. Kelling moved to lay this <br />rezoning matter over until next month. Seconded by Mr. Karth. Carried <br />unanimously. <br />411 <br />Den Waalen, U.S. Lakes Development Co., presented the revised landscaping plan <br />for Chomonix South, showing the additional parking in red. This additional <br />adjacent parking area wasn't shown on the last submitted plat. Sec. 101 <br />states there must be two spaces per driveway - one of which must be enclosed. <br />The concern of Mr. Merier was that this left no visitor parking except on <br />the street. This could be a real hazard to the people in the area. <br />Mr. Hill questioned if this kind of additional space could be made mandatory <br />in our code. Others agreed it would be good. Mr. Karth moved to recommend <br />that this be accepted as presented for additional parking. Seconded by Mr. <br />Shearen. Carried unanimously. <br />A soil capabilities map was presented by Mr. Al Fisher, District Conserva- <br />tionist, Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District. These maps are air <br />photos, the one he showed being 9 field sheets, 1 inch equalling 1,000 feet. <br />He indicated soil samples are taken quite often. Soil capabilities were used <br />in farming most frequently in the past. They can be used to interpret land <br />for urban use. This could foresee some problems that might come up, such as <br />sewer drainage and foundation problems. Mr. Fisher said the map the Metro <br />uses was taken in 1916 and there are only 4 kinds of soil dileniated. The <br />County now uses 50 -60. Even the areas marked as severe limitation as far as <br />building is concerned could be overcome by really working it out, but you <br />must know the soil types and limitations so as to do it properly. The overlay <br />shows major expressways orzone numbers so you can identify what you're looking at. <br />The cost of a map such as this would be $125.00 and $25.00 extra with colors. <br />The planner book is $50.00.