02/16/1972 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

3 2/16/72 that Mr. Van Housen be alerted to submit his approval in the next week, and if not, that Mr. Gotwald be instructed to perform this function prior to the meeting. Seconded by Mr. Hill, Carried unanimously. It was noted that the Clerk should see that Mr. Rehbein gets a copy of the February 15th letter and also a copy of Mr. Van Housen's letter upon receipt. It was suggested that Mr. Rehbein meet with the neighbors as regarding the fencing before the next meeting also. The Clerk wrote to El Rehbein & Son on February 2, 1972, reminding them that a year had passed since they granted permission to start construction on three apartment buildings on land adjoining his office, which was rezoned to commercial for that purpose. Mr. Rehbein's reply is dated February 4th, in which he states it is still their intent to build these apartments, but be- cause of the money and tax situation, they felt it was necessary to hold off construction for another year. He asked that everything stay as it is for at least another year. Mr. Locher noted it is zoned commercial without limita- tion. Therefore, no action was taken. A. A. Johnson Tool submitted plans for a building addition. The planned add- ition is 60 x 60 facing off =Aqua Lane. This is a machine shop and tool and dye - no painting operation, no cleaning or metal treating done. Mr. Gotweld indicated in his February 15th letter that the plans as submitted, do not fulfill the requirements of Ordinance No. 56, Section 5.03. The following items should be included: 1. Certification of plans by a registered architect. 2. Existing or proposed well locations. 3. Parking area and location. 4. Driveway entrance locations. 5. Proposed site elevations and drainage. 6. Septic tank plans and county approval„ 7. Set back distance from the south property line to the new addition. He also questioned the location of the septic tanks as to set back requirement: There is only a one foot setback indicated on the addition plans from the ad- joining property. There should be a 10 foot-set-back from side property, but the existing building sits back less than that. Mr. Johnson was advised to check with the Engineer concerning this set -back. Mr. Van Housen hadn't sub - mitted his comments. Mr. McLean said that Mr. Gotweld had advised that this should be referred to the plumbing inspector. He felt there might be some problem here with drain- age. Mr. Hill advised checking out a new sewage system instead of upgrading the old. Mr. Hill moved to hold this over until the March meeting upon satisfaction of the requirements as outlined in Mr. Gotwald's letter and also comments by the planner. Seconded by Mr. Kelling. Carried unanimously. U.S. Lakes Development Co. requested a variance to the zoning code as pertains to the minimum square footage requirements for a multiple family dwelling. Mr. McLean advised them that we will be looking at this particular section of our code within the next two months. He questioned why an individual property owner should pay for our study. We need to take a look at this square footage allowance for the whole Village, as pertains to single family hoaxes as well as