Laserfiche WebLink
3 4/19/72 <br />being noted. Seconded by Mr. LHiII. Carried unanimously. <br />The request of Mrs. Mary Glischinsky to sell trailer homes at 6333 Hodgson Road <br />was reviewed. The Glischinsky's want to put a small sales lot in where the <br />junk yard now is. They plan about four new homes and several used ones. They <br />now have a sales lot on University Avenue. They have so much vandalism and so <br />many burglaries there that they want to move. This way they can look after the <br />mobile home park as well and upgrade the park through the sale of homes. They <br />plan about a 200 foot frontage with 150 -200 foot setback. There will be off <br />street parking. They were advised they need to submit a proposal in accordance <br />with the zoning code. They would probably need a special use permit. <br />Ken Rehbein, variance to Ordinance 21A. Mr. Rehbein's letter of April 4, 1972, <br />was not clear to the members. He requested "a variance on the lot where the <br />new office building will be located. Our request involves Parcel "A "." It <br />wasn't clear from this whether he planned another building on "B" or just what <br />he wanted done, and since Mr. Locher was not in attendance at this meeting, <br />this is to be put on the agenda for next time. The Clerk is advised to get in <br />touch with the attorney and find out the restrictions. <br />Alex Lichtscheidl - hearing on land split without variance. Mr. Lichtscheidl <br />advised that this originally had been surveyed as two lots. One was lost by <br />one purchasing party six months after purchase. 1t is now recorded the way it <br />was surveyed. The Lichtscheidl's have it back in their possession. They were <br />advised there is no problem. It was dismissed. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Arlo Morehouse request to e-xtend 79th Street. 79th Street is <br />situated right between Luther's Sport Shop and the VFW. It only goes in about <br />3/4 of a mile, and it ends in their yard. They want to divide 40 acres of their <br />land into 10 acre parcels and would need 79th extended about 400 -500 feet. <br />There is a possibility that it could be partly on Ken Rehbein's land, but he <br />is in favor of the extension. Mr. Kellina advised we get the attorney's opin- <br />ion, because if this is allowed a developer could go back in there and then say <br />they don't need to blacktop because the main road is gravel. The members ad- <br />vised Mr. Morehouse to bring in a legal description with the proposed roadway. <br />The Clerkshould then see that both the attorney and engineer are given copies <br />for their review and advice. <br />Mr. McLean advised that he had spent some time talking about the new State Sign <br />Code with Mr. Locher and a gentleman from Brede. Mr. McLean refered to "Rules <br />and Regulations for the Placement and Control of Advertising Devices on Lands <br />Along and Adjacent to the Interstate and Primary Systems of Highways in the <br />State of Minnesota." He refered to page 10, "(h) Certification of Zoning. For <br />the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, Section 173.16, Subdivision 5, bona fide <br />zoning authorities may request the Commissioner of Highways to accept the legi- <br />timate local zoning applicable to control of advertising devices within legally - <br />zoned commercial or industrial areas. All requests for certification shall <br />include information regarding regulation of size, fighting, spacing, and annual <br />permit requirements as well as all pertinent information required to properly <br />evaluate the application. <br />2) All certification shall apply to the then existing boundaries of the zon- <br />ing authority and any further addition or elimination of land will be treated <br />on an individual basis under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section173.16 <br />Subdivision 2. All requests for certification shall include a copy of the min- <br />utes or procedure authorizing the zoning authority to request such certifica- <br />tion from the Commissioner of Highways.