Laserfiche WebLink
2- Sept. 20,1972 <br />the home to allow for this. They were advised they would need a <br />certificate of survey before getting the building permit. <br />Mr. Karth moved to recommend granting the variance as described on the <br />legal description attached to the application. Seconded by Mr. <br />Shearen. Motion Carried. <br />Mr. Earl Kammerer, Jr. appealed for a variance to Ordinance 21A. Mr. <br />Kammerer, Sr. appeared on behalf of his son and daughter -in -law. Mr. <br />Kammerer noted that his attorney had run into a problem when reviewing <br />the records. Mrs. Faymoville, his wife's mother, had given them the <br />property. They don't plan to build, they just want to transfer owner- <br />ship of the property. This property is landlocked. It is a parcel 199.6' <br />by 297.7' deep, accessible to Lilacvia a 60 ft. easement over someone <br />elses property. It was noted this 60 feet would have to be brought up <br />to village standards and then dedicated to the village should anyone ever <br />want to build back in there. <br />Mr. Shearen moved to grant issuance of the variance with the stipulation <br />that a dedicated road be built and established prior to issuance of a <br />building permit. Seconded by Mr. Hill. Carried. <br />The applications for variances to Ordinance #56 by U.S.Lakes was <br />schedialed for 9:15 P.M. Inasmuch as everyone was present, it was begun <br />at 8:45 P.M. The legal description of the first application is: Outlot <br />C and I, Lakes Addition No. 2 Reason for the application for variance <br />is stated as: "the lot size and area requirements of 6.04 are more <br />suitable than those of 6.02 to applicant's permitted use of the subject <br />parcels for single family (R-1) development and platting purposes." <br />125.00 fee was paid 9/19/72. <br />The second application was for : OUtlot G, Lakes Addition No. 2. The <br />reason for application for permission : "applicant's intended platting <br />and development of the subject parcel contemplates single family (R -1) <br />rather than townhouse residences and this use of the parcel is permitted <br />by Ordinance No. 56 when so approved and authorized by Village Council <br />action as provided for in 6.09 and 6.06 (A)." Fee paid of $125.00 on <br />Sept. 19,1972. <br />William Busch,attorney on behalf of U. S. Lakes, presented their appeal. <br />He said Lakes Addition No. 2, Outlot G was never platted. It is now <br />zoned R5, Townhouses. C and I are zoned agricultural and are now used <br />for golf course. Another use of agricultural is Rl residences. They <br />are asking for variance on 300x300 ft. lot size. It is impractical <br />and unsuitable because of all sewer pipet, bitumanous costs, etc. He <br />noted that Outlot G has 14.78 acres: I has 23.03 (formerly to be used <br />for golf course) and C has 9.59 acres. <br />Mr. Busch said assessments of sewer and water are now in process. The <br />Council considered this at their last Council meeting. The Village <br />Engineer said they.are within a few days of formally accepting the sewer. <br />He noted a third party did the contracting - U.S. Lakes never had control <br />or ownership of the system. Because of the assessment, they need to <br />know by early November. This would produce some 60 R1 lots instead of