Laserfiche WebLink
Page Four <br />areas. And that the zoning; be changed from R 5 to R 1. <br />Seconded by ?r. Hill, motion carried withal*. Farrand voting No, in <br />order to stand by the motion he made earlier. <br />Nlr. Busch felt that this recommendation is calling for things foreign <br />to the zoninL end variance code. He felt it asked for things they can <br />comply with as the engineer felt it was feasible, but water and sewer <br />is never done until afterwards. He didn't knot: hoer they could comply <br />with the request for total perks plan. He stated again he didn't know <br />how tbp developer could comply. <br />Mr. Van Houser, Bid there is enough concern on the park of residents <br />that we can look at this from this standpoint. Also Lakes hss not <br />ccrnpli et' with 5.03 c -i,d 05. This is the 3rd change on this plat. <br />Amy change now should be looked at in view of the total plan. <br />17-7. Hill raved to adjourn at 9:50 P. M. Seconded by i r. Shearen. <br />Carried.