Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />The Otter Crossing 2nd Addition preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital <br />improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area <br />(MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the <br />developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. <br />3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. <br />The Otter Crossing 2nd Addition preliminary plat is consistent with infill policies. The <br />development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. The cost of utility and private street extensions is being privately financed by the developer. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. <br /> (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, <br />traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a <br />proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; <br />5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan.