03/12/1983 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

permit but it is my understandinq everything ' s before the council with absolutely nothing done at all after the permit was issued . L I would say this was a difference in scope not a difference in Scope of activities . . . M Mr . Chairman , I refer to Bill Hawkins letter, page 2 , paragraph 3 last sentence . Since the court indicated neither the special use permit nor ordinance 56 were unconstitutional , it is now necessary to determine the action the city may take on this permit under section i 6 . 21 of ordinance #56 , I think we ought to do that . r B Public hearing is in process . M I just, I ain ' t making the motion . I 'm .just making the sugges- tion .. B Are there any more comments? R Just one other comment , Mr . Mayor , if I may . Even the special use permit when you read that it says to use part of Outlot H and i Outlot K in Lakes Addition 7 for the construction of R5 , town houses , quadraminium style , it even referes to the construction type , for preliminary plats of Lakes Addition 7 shall revert to the actual construction type . I 'm really racing this through my mind here and trying to figure out where this planning and where this construction thing is and ever: the special use permits refer to the construction in a physical type of a building put up . B Any other comments? I BB My last remarks , Mr . Mayor , at no time have we not proceded with . the development of that property . B Any more comments? Indicate a motion for I so move K Second All those in favor E Opposed Motion carries. At this time to sum up what I think has taken place here today to deal with this issue . First of all I took a look at Websters New World Dictionary to find out just what the, definitions for the key issue and I brOLaht forth the exact wording from the dictionarv , -20-