Laserfiche WebLink
We have the right and obligation to follow what we set as a as a <br /> right and a precident . If it. means $125 *out of his pocket or if <br /> E L Rehbein cannot afford that amount of money then maybe they <br /> can ' t afford the project so I don ' t think we can look at the dollars <br /> and cents there . I think the special use permit in process is a valid <br /> process with the 6 . 21 of the ordinance to define this and I <br /> think under the circumstances we shoulc decide the issue thoroughly <br /> on the merits of a comment our attorney made on formal 6 . 21 and <br /> back specifying that the project has to begin in 12 month and be <br /> substantially completed in 3 years. <br /> Those are some of the things I got from the comments here . You <br /> have a comment? <br /> E _ I would have to agree with you in one <br /> respect and that is that we ' ve gotten to the stage of the special use <br /> permit in light of himself and as we have so far I think <br /> we are going to carry it to the letter of the law as you have said , <br /> then we are going to have to go back and review some of those ordin- <br /> ances as there aab^ut 10 or 15 that I can think of that have not had <br /> one thing done to them and they have been on the books since (1950- <br /> 1960) and the people just keep coming in and saying someday we ' re <br /> going to have a gas station there and we want to keep it that way , <br /> nothing has been done so I think in effect the course this council is <br /> taking should consider that . Secondly T do believe that use have to <br /> look at each case on its own merit and in this situation I happen to <br /> feel there were some extenuating circumstances in waiting for reports <br /> to be completed . I have to hones`ly believe that if we deny this man <br /> the continuance of that special use permit anyone who votes to do so <br /> wi-11 be in contempt of court . I happen to think the Task Force , <br /> the penple would be in contempt of court in that they have obviously <br /> rezoned that area non multiple family and a court has said it can be <br /> that and therefore this council could never rezone it anything but <br /> that . The fact that has not been rezoned will no} stop Mr . Blackbird <br /> from coming to the city tomorrow to apply for a new special use permit <br /> in which case Dick is right . There certainly isn ' t any reason why <br /> you couldn ' t revoke it tonight but it have to be reissued tomorrow <br /> because you would have no valid reason for denying it . <br /> M Mr . Chariman , I think Mrs . Elsenpeter ' s point is well taken . I <br /> think we ought to and I 'm going to make a motion here but I think to <br /> -23- <br />