My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-31-2012 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2012 Packets
>
05-31-2012 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2022 7:20:54 PM
Creation date
7/8/2022 1:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
05/31/2012
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3) Over the past 16 years, some of these residential properties have been protected <br /> by the opt-out clause while the ownership,land use, and makeup of their <br /> neighborhoods has changed,in part due to non-residential zoning. Would <br /> removing the exempt zones and opt-out rights suddenly leave these property <br /> owners susceptible to expenses they might otherwise be protected from? Beyond <br /> this, do you see any way they might be harmed if the zones are eliminated? Is <br /> there any way a similar susceptibility could come about affecting any of the other <br /> properties in any exempt zone? <br /> Under the existing charter provisions an individual, owner occupied, single <br /> family residential unit within the charter exempt areas can opt out. Linder the <br /> proposed amendment all property owners city wide are treated equally. if the <br /> exempt zones are eliminated than they could not opt-out individually, but rather <br /> would be subject to the decision of the majority of property owners within a <br /> specific project area. <br /> 4) What might be the impact to the property values of the Tots that would lose the <br /> opt-out rights(if any)? Additionally, could removing the exempt zones affect the <br /> property values of any of the properties in these 3 zones? <br /> No. The charter provision does not have any-apparent relationship to property <br /> values. We sent this question and the proposed amendment to Mike <br /> Sutherland,Anoka County Assessor. His response was that the proposed <br /> amendment would not cause them to automatically adjust any property values. u <br /> wroperty values are based on the market place, indicated by records of property <br /> sales. <br /> 5) In all 3 zones,could changing the rules governing assessable projects as is being <br /> proposed give any of those owners legitimate grounds to sue the city for damages <br /> (or incurred costs)? <br /> No. What would the damages be? Assessments, as governed by state law, are <br /> based on the special benefit received as a result of the proieet. <br /> 6) The Commission is looking for"before and after pictures" of how the proposed <br /> changes would/could affect these properties. Is there anything else you can <br /> provide to help accomplish this? <br /> As noted in question no. 3, the only difference is that these properties would be <br /> subject to the same requirements as evervone else in the city. They could not <br /> opt-out individuallv,,but rather would be subject to the decision of the majority <br /> of property owners within a specific proiect area. <br /> Please feel free to contact me with questions at (651) 982-2427. <br /> JACharter\Response to Charter Questions.dot �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.