My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-01-2022 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-01-2022 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 7:05:31 PM
Creation date
8/3/2022 12:34:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/01/2022
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
831
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aALLIANT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 11 Robinson Sod Farm PAGE23 <br />The project is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) because there <br />are no known maternity roosts or hibernacula of this species on the project site and within <br />the project vicinity (MN DNR & USFWS, 2021). There are less than 10 tree species on site and <br />they are concentrated by the sod farm office space. Tree clearing is not expected to <br />substantially impact NLEB's roosting, breeding, and feeding given the limited amount of <br />available existing trees on site. Construction will be mindful of the tree clearing exclusion <br />dates and to the extent possible, clear trees between October and April. This will reduce the <br />risk of impacting migratory songbirds and roosting bats, if they are potentially in the small <br />cluster of trees present by the existing sod farm office space. <br />• The project site is not known to contain highly suitable habitat for the monarch butterfly and <br />the rusty patched bumble bee. The vegetation habitat available on site is dominantly by sod <br />and not flowering plants that would attract the monarch butterfly and rusty patched bumble <br />bee. The residential development of the site will likely improve pollinator habit by increasing <br />native plant diversity through landscapes buffers and reducing pesticide use. <br />BMPs consisting of erosion control measures, listed under Item 11.b.ii., will be installed on the <br />project site prior to construction to control invasive species and weeds to the extent practicable. <br />Since the project site is in sod farm production, the site has been manipulated to reduce weedy and <br />invasive species. After construction and grading are complete, the exposed soil will be planted with <br />turf grass (for residential units) or approved, native seed mixes designed to establish desirable <br />vegetation in order to mitigate the risk of invasive species. <br />d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, <br />plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. <br />As part of the development, the creation of stormwater basins, lawn/landscaping, and trees will <br />greatly improve the existing conditions of the project site. The proposed improvements will increase <br />habitat for fish, wildlife, and plant communities on -site that did not exist before. <br />Any slopes requiring semi -permanent reinforced netting will use non -plastic biodegradable fabric or <br />rectangular shapes to mitigate impacts to wildlife. <br />14. Historic Properties <br />Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close <br />proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural <br />features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated <br />effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be <br />taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. <br />A data request was submitted to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to <br />determine if there were any historical or archaeological sites identified on site. The SHPO responded <br />stating that there are no known historical or archaeological records for the project site. See Appendix <br />E for the SHPO correspondence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.