2022-082 Council Resolution - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 22-82 AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FOR THE QUAD AREA COMMUNITY FOR THE 2°d ANNUAL FAMILY FUN FESSTIVAL AUGUST 18,2022 WHEREAS,the Quad Area Chamber of Commerce has submitted an application for a special event permit; and WHEREAS,the event plan includes music outdoors from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Thursday, August 18, 2022 as well as various food trucks and a car show; and WHEREAS, telephone service shall be in place sufficient to connect to emergency services; and WHEREAS,the Public Safety Department has reviewed plans for the event and has provided conditions for the permit; and WHEREAS, food truck vendors are required to contact the Anoka County Environmental Services at 763-324-4260 for permission to operate in the City; and WHEREAS, food truck vendors are required to provide their state licensing information as well as Anoka County Environmental Services licensing to the Quad Area Chamber of Commerce; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Department requires food vendors to be at least 20 feet from the structures; and WHEREAS,proof of general liability insurance has been submitted by the Quad Area Chamber of Commerce to cover all events held on the Centennial School District property; and WHEREAS, city staff has reviewed the Application for Permit for the festival event for concurrence with city regulations; and WHEREAS, event shall end as articulated in the application. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota: That the City Council authorizes issuance of a Special Event Permit to the Quad Area Chamber of Commerce for their event scheduled for August 18, 2022, with the conditions attached hereto. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 8th day of August 2022. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember Lyden and was duly seconded by Councilmember Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Lyden, Stoesz, Cavegn, Rafferty The following voted against same: None (Absent - Ruhland)