Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : August 1,2022 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 10:15 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz,Lyden,Ruhland, <br /> 8 Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Community Development <br /> 12 Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Rookery Activity Center Manager <br /> 13 Lisa Lamey; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; Public Services Director Rick <br /> 14 DeGardner;Public Safety Deputy Director of Fire Division Dan L'Allier; City Clerk Julie <br /> 15 Bartell <br /> 16 <br /> 17 1. Hugo Public Works Facility Tour—8220 140tb Street North Hugo, MN <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Community Room <br /> 20 Following Public Works Facility Tour <br /> 21 <br /> 22 2. Robinson Sod Farm Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)— <br /> 23 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed a PowerPoint presentation that <br /> 24 included information on the following: <br /> 25 <br /> 26 -Relevant terms that are included in these reviews; <br /> 27 -EAW questions are standards set by the state; does not approve or deny a project; <br /> 28 -EAW Process—City is proper unit to complete the document;process includes <br /> 29 distribution and comment period; City can respond to comments; City makes <br /> 30 determination based on need for Environmental Impact Statement(EIS); environmental <br /> 31 review is done if no EIS is needed; <br /> 32 -Topics covered by an EAW; <br /> 33 -Project Background—yield or PUD (concept plan by developer calls for PUD); <br /> 34 (developer spoke to their desire to build something unique—yield plan is more common); <br /> 35 -Project Impact Analysis—includes surface water,public utilities,traffic; <br /> 36 -EAW Document—is available in full. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Staff will be asking for council action to put the EAW out for comment(30 day comment <br /> 39 period) <br /> 40 <br /> 41 3. Water Treatment Plant—Design Services Proposal—Community <br /> 42 Development Director Grochala noted that WSB &Associates, Inc. has come forward <br /> 43 with a proposal for design services and staff is comfortable with the fees proposed. He <br /> 44 explained the elements that would be included—for water mains,treatment facility. <br /> 45 There would be an architectural partner on the project. Funding sources and possible <br /> 1 <br />