My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2022-106 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2022
>
2022-106 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2022 7:29:02 PM
Creation date
9/23/2022 9:16:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
09/12/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 22-106 <br /> RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF GATEWAY DESIGN <br /> PLAN <br /> WHEREAS,the 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the need to develop design standards to <br /> strengthen and maintain the appearance of the City's gateways and key transportation corridors, <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS,three of the City's six identified gateway location are currently under <br /> consideration for improvement; and <br /> WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Board has recommended the preparation of a design study <br /> to guide improvements to these key locations, and <br /> WHEREAS, WSB and Associates has submitted a proposal to prepare a design guideline <br /> document for gateway locations and final plans for the Hodgson and County Road J intersection, <br /> NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of The City of Lino Lakes: <br /> That the Gateway Design study is hereby ordered and WSB and Associates is directed <br /> to prepare the study in an amount of$37,000. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of September, 2022. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember <br /> Lyden and was duly seconded by Councilmember Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon, <br /> the following voted in favor thereof. Lyden, Cavegn, Stoesz, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same: None (Absent- Ruhland) <br /> Ro afferty, Nfayor <br /> ATTEST: <br /> li ne Bartell, City ler <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.