09-26-2022 City Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DRAFT 89 on slides). 90 91 Councilmember Lyden asked if metal standing seam roofing has been considered for the 92 cottages. He doesn't have a problem with the proposed changes. He thinks steel siding 93 is ultimately better than vinyl and the developer representative explained that the choice 94 of materials was made long ago. 95 96 Councilmember Ruhland said he has no issue with the changes. 97 98 Councilmember Cavegn asked about the quality difference in the fiber to vinyl and Mr. 99 Prunty noted that fiber is utilized in other areas of the project and he sees them as merely 100 different applications and looks. 101 102 City Planner Larsen noted that staff proposes that this discussion will serve as 103 authorization for the changes; staff doesn't propose any formal council action. The 104 council concurred with the changes and process. 105 3. Anderson Companies — Lake & Main Concept Plan — Community 106 Development Director Grochala said the City has been approached about development of 107 the NE quadrant of Lake Drive and Main Street. The council then discussed some of the 108 preliminary ideas (300+ residential units). Based on council comments, the development 109 team has worked on the concept, added some new team members, and are working on 110 redesigning the site. There was an overhead of the site shown. Included in the packet 111 is a site plan as well as a project narrative. The City's EDAC group reviewed the 112 concept plan and is supportive with inclusion of key goals; Planning and Zoning has been 113 supportive of planning efforts. 114 115 Tim Marco, Director of Development at Anderson Companies. He did not work on the 116 previous plan but he has joined the Anderson team and can speak to work that's ongoing 117 and the desire to work together with the City. They'd like to get some feedback on 118 appropriate next steps. Mr. Marco noted discussion on The Tavern parcel and how 119 discussion will be ongoing and perhaps that property will be considered for future 120 inclusion. The question noted by Mr. Marco is whether this project includes enough 121 commercial to satisfy the City Council, adding that he didn't hear a "no" on that question 122 from the advisory groups. He noted the commercial access point planned and the 123 importance he sees in maintaining that point. There was discussion about the western 124 border, some City owned property there and the possibility of having some type of drive 125 area. Elements included in the proposal: single -level villas and a senior campus including 126 assisted living and independent living, rental with no for sale properties. 127 128 Councilmember Stoesz noted the green space on the south; will that be lost if commercial 129 comes in? Mr. Marco explained that the space is intended for commercial. Staff also 130 noted trail and sidewalk plans 131 132 Councilmember Cavegn said he's warming to the plans. He likes the density much