Laserfiche WebLink
where Carl Street is not mentioned as a variable, would you please clarify as to why Carl Street is <br />repeatedly targeted for change, negatively affecting our property values, safety, well-being, <br />wildlife, creek, and vegetation ? <br />16. The trajectory of land development leads to increased noise, cutting down of trees, causing <br />damage and instability to wildlife, clean water, vegetation, pollinator insects, soil and other <br />ecosystems. Will this result in the formation of “heat islands” caused by those losses and the <br />absorption of more heat by impervious pavement including sidewalks, parking areas and <br />adverse effects on our climate, air and water quality? <br />17. Did the City of Lino Lakes or Alliant Engineering consult with the FAA regarding traffic proximity <br />to the Lino Air Park airstrip? <br />18. Did the City of Lino Lakes or Alliant Engineering conduct a traffic analysis relevant to headlight <br />penetration onto the Lino Air Park airstrip as this can cause temporary flash blindness? This will <br />be a safety hazard to pilots. <br />19. Has the risk of increased traffic on Carl Street in proximity to the Lino Air Park been considered <br />secondary to vehicle drivers being distracted while watching airplanes take off and land, thus <br />not watching our children playing or residents walking or biking down Carl Street? <br />20. How was a 2-day traffic study on Carl Street “valid” both in methodology and analysis assuring <br />“statistical significance levels?” <br />21. When is the Planning & Zoning commission conducting a hearing and vote on changing the <br />Robinson property zoning from agricultural to residential? <br /> <br />Please acknowledge that this letter is received in its entirety and entered into the record. Please <br />provide a timeline in which we can expect a response to our questions. <br />Regards, <br />Carl Street Families, Lino Lakes residents <br /> <br /> <br />