10-03-2022 Council Work Session Packet

Home Search

2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: In addition to the government agencies, the City received 15 emails from the public. These include: • Nicki Roland Ecker – August 25, 2022 • Anna Jungbauer – August 25, 2022 • Morgan C – August 25, 2022 • Justin Carver – August 26, 2022 • Mike Trudeau – August 30, 2022 • Mara Lipinski – September 5, 2022 • Greg and Sarah Austin – September 10, 2022 • Carl Street Residents – September 12, 2022 • Ann Rudie – September 12, 2022 • Doug and Cindy Hansen – September 12, 2022 • Steven Anderson – September 12, 2022 • Scott Zbikowski – September 13, 2022 • Lisa and Ernst Olsen – September 14, 2022 • Kevin and Tammy Dunrud – September 14, 2022 • Reilly Anderson – September 15, 2022 4. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS This document responds to comments individually. It includes summaries of comments followed by responses. The complete comment letters and emails are included in Appendix A. Responses to comments are generally confined to substantive issues that “address the accuracy and completeness of the material contained in the EAW, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced, and the need for an EIS on the proposed project.” (MN Rules 4410.1600). Some of the comments included general remarks or recommendations. Such comments are noted for the record and further detail of the statements or recommendations is included in Appendix A. 4.1 COMMENTS FROM GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 4.1.1 Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) – September 9, 2022 Comment: The Minnesota SHPO concludes that there are no properties listed in the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological resources located in the area that will be affected by this project. Response: This comment has been noted for the record. The SHPO was contacted as part of the EAW process and their response is included in Appendix E of the EAW.