My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-07-2022 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
11-07-2022 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 9:10:12 AM
Creation date
12/12/2022 2:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/07/2022
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> <br /> <br />• A tot lot shall be included in the townhome private park similar to existing <br />townhome neighborhood <br />o City will credit the private park land dedication and trail construction costs <br />as agreed to in the Master PUD Development Agreement <br />o City will not credit the tot lot construction costs <br />• A trail connection shall be added from existing trail to townhome neighborhood <br />• A trail connection shall be added from the townhome neighborhood to the north <br />• The ditch easement along the north lot line of the development shall be shown and <br />accounted for on the lots <br />• All lot sizes shall be continuous buildable land and at a minimize size of Lot <br />Width x 130ft. <br />• Setbacks will remain the same <br />o Front = 25ft <br />o Side = 7.5 ft <br />o Rear = 25ft <br />• All housing products shall meet Watermark architectural standards <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Board Comments <br /> <br />The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the concept plan on October 12, 2022 and had <br />the following comments: <br /> <br />• Why is Lennar proposing amendment now? <br />o Forest Lake School District expressing more interest. <br />o Villa product not performing as well as Lennar expected. <br />o Amendment process takes time and all civil plans would need to be <br />revised. <br />• Concern that eliminating the villas homes takes away from the mixed use of <br />housing types <br />• How many 45ft wide do we have now? <br />o None but the original approved Watermark land use plan under Mattamy <br />had 84 lots that were 44ft wide. <br />• Lack of general support for 45ft wide lots. <br />• Additional townhomes would require variation in exterior colors. <br />• The same number of housing units but closer together making it feel denser. <br />• What is PUD benefit? <br />o More open space <br />o Less street and utility maintenance costs for City <br />• General support for dog park and tot lot near townhome neighborhood. <br />• Would garage sizes need to meet previously approved Watermark standards as <br />shown in chart above or the proposed zoning ordinance update of 520sf (20ft <br />wide x 26ft deep)? <br /> <br />PUD Concept Plan Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.