My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-14-2022 City Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
11-14-2022 City Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 9:17:11 AM
Creation date
12/12/2022 2:14:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/14/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK <br />SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />44 The council had no further questions and Community Development Director Grochala <br />45 noted that a public hearing will be held on the subject at the next council meeting, <br />46 followed by the Economic Development Agency (EDA) meeting to consider the tax <br />47 increment financing plan. <br />48 2. Robinson Sod Farm EAW — Community Development Director Grochala <br />49 reviewed the written staff report outlining the Environment Assessment Worksheet <br />50 process for the Robinson Farm area. He introduced Alison Harwood of WSB & <br />51 Associates who has assisted the City on the process. He noted the information gathering <br />52 nature of the EAW process and the City's role for using the information gained through <br />53 the document. <br />54 <br />55 Ms. Harwood reviewed a presentation outlining the EAW process and findings (included <br />56 in council packet). The City's Environmental Board will be reviewing this subject at <br />57 their meeting and forwarding any comments to the City Council. <br />58 <br />59 Councilmember Lyden noted certain communications received on this matter, including <br />60 from governmental agencies and individuals. He asked about the downside of doing an <br />61 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Ms. Harwood suggested it would be a <br />62 detailed process that would expand time and expense needed for the project. Staff is not <br />63 recommending an EIS. Councilmember Lyden noted his interest in seeing development <br />64 of a real community. <br />65 <br />66 Mayor Rafferty received confirmation that all comments submitted have received a <br />67 response, with staff explaining the responses are a part of the official report. <br />68 <br />69 Councilmember Stoesz asked about infrastructure needs (i.e., sewer, water, broadband) <br />70 and Director Grochala explained that those are generally considerations covered by the <br />71 City's comprehensive plan. <br />72 <br />73 There was no public comments taken but staff was available for questions. <br />74 <br />75 Mr. Grochala noted that comments of the Environmental Board will be forwarded to the <br />76 council in their weekly update. <br />77 <br />78 3. Villas on Vicky, PUD Discussion — City Planner Larsen noted the council's previous <br />79 review of concept plans related to this proposed development. The goal for the developer <br />80 is to understand more about the council's interest. <br />81 <br />82 Planner Larsen reviewed a presentation that included information on the concept <br />83 (included in packet). Project developer Jon Blattman was present and responded to <br />84 questions. <br />85 <br />86 Councilmember Lyden applauded the positive changes coming forward. He confirmed <br />87 that the community gardens would have a water supply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.