Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report <br />City of Lino Lakes, MN <br />WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 15 <br />Construction Cost - Option 3 <br />Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments <br />MOBILIZATION LS 1 $30,000 $30,000 ~10% of total budget <br />COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 12500 $17.50 $218,750 Essentially all cut and removal from site <br />COMMON EMBANKMENT C Y 600 $17.50 $10,500 Fill old channel <br />RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets <br />12" RCP L F 240 $90 $21,600 Based on OneOffice <br />12" RCP APRON EACH 5.00 $1,500 $7,500 Based on OneOffice <br />FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 4.00 $3,000 $12,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate <br />STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr <br />SILT FENCE L F 400 $3.50 $1,400 <br />Need around grading + 40' to double up at culvert <br />outlet <br />EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 9500 $3 $28,500 <br />Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - <br />bottom contour area) <br />SEEDING ACRE 3.6 $2,000 $7,200 <br />Assume seeding occurs within full limits of <br />disturbance plus over access route <br />SEED MIX 25-151 LB 55 $10 $550 <br />Seeding over access road and old channel, 120 <br />lb/ac <br />SEED MIX 34-261 LB 100 $75 $7,500 Seeding wetland/pond/channel areas, 31.5 lb/ac <br />LIVE STAKES EACH 210 $3 $544 Stabilization along erosive edge of realigned ditch <br />1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 55 $400 $22,000 Based on OneOffice <br />SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice <br />5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 <br />20% Contingency $75,889 <br />Total:$455,333 <br />8.1 Modeling Results <br />TSS Removal <br />(lb/yr) <br />TP Removal <br />(lb/yr) <br />Ditch 100 -yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) <br />1,297 8.37 891.30 0.85 <br /> <br />The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The <br />proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with <br />their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing <br />modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of <br />basin volume. As such, Concept 3 shows the slightly decreased benefits compared to <br />Concept 2, b ut they are still significant. <br />8.2 Construction E stimate <br />Excavation costs still dominate the estimate project total under this concept, but <br />less so than Concept 2. 12,500 cubic yards of excavation are proposed, but this <br />would be slightly offset with the propos ed embankment volumes to fill in the old ditch <br />channel. Earthwork estimates account for about 70 percent of total improvement <br />costs. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is <br />$455,350. It should be noted the construction estimate does not include potential <br />recreational improvements such as a boardwalk or trail. <br />Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to <br />establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a <br />minimum of t wo site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and <br />herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the <br />recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is <br />$34,380. Monitoring the vegetation ea ch year would provide the C ity with an <br />adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per <br />year for five years is $8,500. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />