Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report <br />City of Lino Lakes, MN <br />WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 9 <br />Construction Cost - Option 1 <br />Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments <br />MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,000 $10,000 ~10% of total budget <br />COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 3000 $17.50 $52,500 Essentially all cut and removal from site <br />RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets <br />12" RCP L F 190 $90 $17,100 Based on OneOffice <br />12" RCP APRON EACH 2.00 $1,500 $3,000 Based on OneOffice <br />FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 2.00 $3,000 $6,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate <br />STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr <br />SILT FENCE L F 810 $3.50 $2,835 <br />Need around grading + 40' to double up at <br />culvert outlet <br />EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 3000 $3 $9,000 <br />Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - <br />bottom contour area) <br />SEEDING ACRE 1.4 $2,000 $2,800 <br />Assume seeding occurs within full limits of <br />disturbance plus over access route <br />SEED MIX 25-151 LB 24 $10 $240 Seeding over access road <br />SEED MIX 34-261 LB 40 $75 $3,000 Seeding wetland/pond areas <br />1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 60 $400 $24,000 Based on OneOffice <br />SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice <br />5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 <br />20% Contingency $28,375 <br />Total:$170,250 <br />It does afford space for a pathway between th e wetlands and educational interaction <br />points. Concept 1 generally works , but can be improved upon to achieve the greatest <br />site benefits. <br />6.1 Modeling Results <br />TSS Removal <br />(lb/yr) <br />TP Removal <br />(lb/yr) <br />Ditch 100 -yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) <br />758 4.21 891.43 0.72 <br /> <br />The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The <br />proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with <br />their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing <br />modeled pollu tant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of <br />basin volume. As such, Concept 1 shows the least benefits of all options due to its <br />smaller basin footprint. <br />6.2 Construction Estimate <br />The main driver of costs for all the provided concept s are excavation costs. Concept <br />1 calls for approximately 3000 cubic yards of excavation, driving about 50 percent of <br />the construction costs. Other major costs include the construction of associated <br />storm sewer and vegetation restoration across the site. T he total estimated concept <br />cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $170,250. <br />Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to <br />establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a <br />minimum of two sit e visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and <br />herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the <br />recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is <br />$34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each yea r would provide the C ity with an <br />adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per <br />year for five years is $8,500. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />