My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-06-2023 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
Searchable Packets
>
02-06-2023 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2023 10:45:04 AM
Creation date
2/10/2023 10:40:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/06/2023
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Expense <br /> Benefits provided by the trees <br />The Environmental Board voted “Yes” to Question 1. <br /> <br />When boulevard trees are removed by the City, they are replaced as soon as budget <br />allows. This is not a requirement of the City, but a service that is being provided to the <br />community in recognition of the benefits that trees provide. The trees are replaced with <br />funds from the City’s forestry budget. <br /> <br />Question 2: Should the City continue the practice of replacing boulevard trees that <br />have been removed? <br />Considerations: <br /> Expense <br /> Potential loss of benefits provided by if trees aren’t replaced <br />The Environmental Board voted “Yes” to Question 2. <br /> <br />There are occasions in which a resident may not want to have the boulevard tree replaced. <br />They may be interested in planting their own tree on the private side of the property line <br />and outside the drainage and utility easement , they may want to install some other <br />landscaping that a tree might compete with, or they may not want a tree in that location <br />for another reason. <br /> <br />Question 3: Should a resident have the choice to opt -out of a replacement if the <br />boulevard tree associated with their property is removed? <br /> Considerations: <br /> <br /> CONS of offering an opt -out <br /> <br /> There would be a decrease in the overall benefits that the urban forest is <br />providing to the community. <br /> Future homeowners may want a boulevard tree. The site conditions may <br />no longer be conducive to planting a tree at that time. A resident choosing <br />to opt-out may be choosing for future residents on that property as well. <br /> Opt-out properties may disrupt the aesthetics of a street that has a uniform <br />row of similar species. <br />PROS of offering an opt-out <br /> Opt-out option provides more flexibility to residents who have a specific <br />tree species or landscaping plan in mind for their yard. <br /> Providing the opt -out option can minimize potential conflicts with <br />residents who would rather not participate in t he program. <br /> The City would not be cutting down healthy trees to facilitate the opt -out <br />option.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.