My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/08/2023 P & Z Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2023
>
03/08/2023 P & Z Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2023 11:55:26 AM
Creation date
3/3/2023 10:57:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/08/2023
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> <br />5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the proposed <br />development must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected <br />traffic from the proposed development or the developer will pay to correct <br />any structural deficiencies. <br /> <br />6. The traffic generated from a proposed development shall not require City <br />street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital <br />Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider <br />developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br /> <br />7. The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, <br />interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County <br />and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to <br />determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must <br />determine traffic generated by the proposed development project, how this <br />traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the <br />improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including <br />project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other <br />properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br /> <br />The proposed tennis court and parking lot reconstruction is within the capabilities of the <br />City. Elm Street is a local road and is capable of handling the additional traffic volume <br />generated by the five (5) additional parking spaces. <br /> <br />(e) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water <br />supply. <br /> <br />The proposed tennis court and parking lot reconstruction does not require a water <br />supply. <br /> <br />(f) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate or safe sanitary <br />sewer system. <br /> <br />The proposed tennis court and parking lot reconstruction does not require sanitary <br />sewer. <br /> <br />(g) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of <br />City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />The proposed tennis court and parking lot reconstruction does not require City funds. <br /> <br />(h) Fire prevention and fighting equipment acceptable to the Board of Fire <br />Underwriters and City Council shall be readily available when any activity
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.