Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Board <br />August 31, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson went on to say the site does not fall into a drinking water supply <br />management area and is not in a flood management zone. It’s not in the AUAR <br />environmental review boundary. It’s not in shore land district, there are no wetlands <br />indicated on the site, and this site is not in the Greenway system. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated for trails there are already sidewalks constructed on the south and <br />east perimeters of the site. On the 2040 comprehensive plan there is a proposed <br />pedestrian trail on the west perimeter and a proposed bike lane on Lake Drive. Both of <br />these things may be included with future reconstruction of Lake Drive and will not be <br />installed at this time. There is a 15 foot easement already in place to accommodate <br />these future improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson then covered the landscaping of the property stating there is already a <br />master landscaping plan in place that was approved in 2001 that covers the entire <br />marketplace retail area including Target, Kohl’s and the retail areas. The current <br />landscape submittal is measured against the master landscaping plan rather than <br />current ordinance. He then highlighted some differences between the current submittal <br />and the master landscaping plan, noting that the current submittal was an improvement <br />on the 2001 plan in terms of additional plants, increased diversity, and replacing ash <br />trees with a different species. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz asked if the plantings along Lake Drive are within that 15 ft. easement. <br />Mr. Nelson said he would need to look at the map closer. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz voiced concern that those plants would have to be removed to <br />implement the future bike trail. Mr. Nelson said that this concern could be added to <br />the Board comments. <br /> <br />Chair Sullivan asked how current ordinance requirements differ from the requirements <br />that the 2001 master landscaping plan was held to. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson responded that the current ordinance is more stringent than what was in <br />place for the 2001 master plan submittal, but noted that the current plan included <br />calculations related to current ordinance, and that it would probably meet current <br />ordinance as well as adhering to the 2001 plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson continued the current landscaping plan and stated there will be 24 <br />deciduous trees, 32 coniferous trees, 173 shrubs, 46 perennials and 100 ornamental <br />grasses. Any areas not covered by landscaping will be sodded for permanent <br />stabilization. <br /> <br />Chair Sullivan asked if there would be a sprinkler system and Mr. Nelson stated that <br />there would be. <br /> <br />Chair Sullivan asked what kind of grass would be put in and Mr. Nelson stated sod, <br />turf grass. <br />