Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM 6A <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner <br />MEETING DATE: March 13, 2023 <br />TOPIC: Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 01-23 City Code Chapter <br />1010: Signs <br />INTRODUCTION <br />City Code Chapter 1010: Signs regulates signs. In 2014, the City amended the sign ordinance. <br />Staff is proposing another amendment to the ordinance to reflect changes that have transpired <br />from a federal court case. Kristin Nierengarten, attorney with Rupp, Anderson, Squires, <br />Waldspurger, & Mace, presented the sign ordinance amendment to Council at the March 6, 2023 <br />Work Session. <br />BACKGROUND <br />The main purpose of the revisions to the City’s sign ordinance is to bring the ordinance in line <br />with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert, which determined that <br />content-based regulation of signs are generally impermissible and could violate the First <br />Amendment. In short, the court said that government can’t regulate signs based on the <br />communicative intent or message of those signs. The courts have signaled, however, that <br />concerns for safety can justify content-based sign regulations and that distinctions can be drawn <br />for on-premise versus off-premise signs and commercial versus non-commercial signs. The sign <br />ordinance revisions reflect this evolution in case law. <br />A secondary goal of revising the sign ordinance is to increase its clarity and readability to ease <br />administration and enforcement. This includes cutting down on unused definitions, standardizing <br />language, and addressing potential conflicts or unnecessary language. <br />For the most part, the revisions are geared toward maintaining the City’s original intent in its <br />sign regulation, while eliminating disallowed content-based regulations. <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 8, 2023. Public comments <br />included the request to increase the size of dynamic display signs from 20sf to 50sf. Staff <br />recommended an increase to 32sf. The Board recommended approval of the sign ordinance with <br />the condition that obscene signs be addressed and that staff research dynamic signs and bring <br />back information to the Board at a later date. Obscene sign language has been added to the <br />revised sign ordinance under Section 1010.005 Prohibited Signs.