My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-06-2023 Council Work Session Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
03-06-2023 Council Work Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2023 10:31:29 AM
Creation date
3/30/2023 10:31:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/06/2023
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL <br /> 2 WORK SESSION <br /> 3 MINUTES <br /> 4 <br /> 5 DATE : March 6,2023 <br /> 6 TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. <br /> 7 TIME ENDED : 9:26 p.m. <br /> 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, Cavegn, Mayor <br /> 9 Rafferty <br /> 1 o MEMBERS ABSENT : Councilmember Ruhland <br /> 11 Staff members present: City Planner Katie Larsen; City Clerk/Finance Director Hannah Lynch; <br /> 12 Community Development Director Michael Grochala; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; <br /> 13 Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; Attorney Kristen Nierengarten of Rupp, Anderson, <br /> 14 Squires, Waldspurger, & Mace; Environmental Coordinator Andy Nelson; Activity Center <br /> 15 Manager, Lisa Lamey. <br /> 16 Item 1 —Sign Ordinance Amendment—Attorney Nierengarten gave an overview of revisions <br /> 17 proposed to the sign ordinance noting the City is addresseing a Supreme Court case that one <br /> 18 cannot regulate signs based on their content. She spoke about stripping out regulation, cleaning <br /> 19 up the ordinance, language consistencies, and what can and cannot be regulated regardings signs. <br /> 20 Mayor Rafferty asked if the City can have an ordinacne prohibiting billboards. Attorney <br /> 21 Nierengarten replied in the affirmative, the City can prohibit billboards due to safety and <br /> 22 aesthetics. <br /> 23 Mayor Rafferty asked what aesthetics might mean. Attorney Niergarten replied it could mean <br /> 24 that signs must be under a certain height, or regulations regarding the base of the sign. <br /> 25 Councilmember Lyden thinks it could be a little dicey in a legal sense as to who determines what <br /> 26 is aesthetically pleasing or not. Attorney Nierengarten noted this ordinance does not get that deep <br /> 27 and noted safety and aesthetics being the main drivers. <br /> 28 Councilmember Stoesz asked if Home Owners Associations (HOAs) have additional restrictions <br /> 29 on freedom of speech signs. Attorney Nierengarten replied that HOAs are self-governing and <br /> 30 can implement bylaws and that is within their association. As a private entity they are not subject <br /> 31 to the First Amendment and could say political signs are not allowed. Councilmember Stoesz <br /> 32 asked about signs inside commercial entities. Attorney Nierengarten replied the ordinance is <br /> 33 attempting to regulate signs that are reasonably viewable from off the property. Councilmember <br /> 34 Steosz asked if the State has sign regulations. Attorney Nierengarten noted the State has some <br /> 35 regulations that apply along highways, however on the whole, the State leaves sign regulation to <br /> 36 municipalities. <br /> 37 Mayor Rafferty asked what the City needs to be concerned about at the highest level? <br /> 38 Attorney Nierengarten shared about signs in election years where regulations are lifted regarding <br /> 39 the number of signs and the size of signs. She also noted signs are never allowed in the public <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.