My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-27-2023 City Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
Searchable Packets
>
03-27-2023 City Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2023 3:28:33 PM
Creation date
3/30/2023 3:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/27/2023
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed development <br />is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed development will not degrade <br />the level of service more than one grade. <br />2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed development is C, traffic <br />generated by a proposed development will not degrade the level of service <br />below C. <br />3.If the existing LOS outside of the proposed development is D, traffic <br />generated by a proposed development will not degrade the level of service <br />below D. <br />4.The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections <br />providing access to the proposed development. If the existing level of <br />service is E or F, the developer must provide, as part of the proposed <br />project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. <br />5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the proposed <br />development must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected <br />traffic from the proposed development or the developer will pay to correct <br />any structural deficiencies. <br />6. The traffic generated from a proposed development shall not require City <br />street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital <br />Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider <br />developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br />7. The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, <br />interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County <br />and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to <br />determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must <br />determine traffic generated by the proposed development project, how this <br />traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the <br />improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including <br />project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other <br />properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br />The proposed tennis court and parking lot reconstruction is within the capabilities of the <br />City. Elm Street is a local road and is capable of handling the additional traffic volume <br />generated by the five (5) additional parking spaces. <br />(e)The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water <br />supply.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.