Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />Mr. DeGardner stated many communities have neighborhood parks throughout the City with one 117 <br />central park that has an inclusive playground and the City may spend $500,000 to $1,000,000 on 118 <br />that. 119 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked to show the Councilmembers a video from the Northland website 120 <br />regarding inclusive playgrounds. His personal thought is that just being ADA compliant is a low-121 <br />bar and the City must rise some level above that. The video was shown to the Councilmembers. 122 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if Mr. DeGardner would recommend having one major park with 123 <br />full accessibility. Mr. DeGardner replied in the affirmative and noted perhaps even a second park 124 <br />in the future. 125 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked Mr. Johnson about ballpark numbers for ramping up the inclusivity 126 <br />at the City’s parks. Mr. Johnson noted just adding a ramp with the inclusive slides and without 127 <br />the surfacing, the City would go from $75,000 to approximately $125,000. Adding the rubber 128 <br />surface would add another $100,000. Councilmember Stoesz clarified it would be about 129 <br />$250,000 per park. 130 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked about funding sources. Mr. DeGardner noted there are probably 131 <br />grants the City could look at. 132 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted in talking about the other inclusive playgrounds in cities such as Richfield, 133 <br />Plymouth, and Woodbury, the populations of those cities dwarf that of Lino Lakes. He noted 134 <br />Lino Lakes does not have the same type of funds to utilize when it comes to parks. He asked 135 <br />Park Board Member Pat Huelman what conversations the Board has had on the matter. 136 <br />Park Board Member Huelman noted all of the parks within the City were built on the back of a 137 <br />development when it went in with no money left over for added features or replacements. At 138 <br />some point, Lino Lakes decided to invest in small, neighborhood parks and did not invest in a 139 <br />destination community park with those bigger features. He noted the Park Board has been so 140 <br />limited in money that it has been a challenge to keep the small neighborhood parks funded 141 <br />properly. 142 <br />Councilmember Lyden thinks the standard for accessibility is the bare minimum, and if the 143 <br />Council decides that this is a priority, they will do it. 144 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted three parks are on the agenda for this summer that are on hold. 145 <br />Mr. DeGardner agrees with Councilmember Lyden’s comments that ADA compliance 146 <br />requirements are probably not as stringent or high as some people want. He reiterated Staff’s 147 <br />perspective and in working with Mr. Johnson over the years, that the City exceeds those ADA 148 <br />requirements and standards. For example regarding the Watermark project, the standard was to 149 <br />have 9 elevated accessible components and the project has 12; they are required to have 7 ground 150 <br />level components and the project has 20 components. 151 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if the City is tapped into Anoka County resources and whether 152 <br />they can push to add a regional park in the area. Mr. DeGardner replied if the City Council 153