My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Resolution 23-038
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2023
>
Resolution 23-038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2023 11:29:37 AM
Creation date
4/25/2023 11:29:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
04/24/2023
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID:040056EC-0D41-4D98-9C65-E01AE876A6AB <br /> Bankruptcy Resolutions are not actually distributed to the Parties until on or after August <br /> 1, 2022, in order to allow the Parties to pursue legislative change that would take effect <br /> before the Opioid Settlement Funds are received by the Parties. Such steps may include, <br /> but are not limited to, the Attorney General's Office delaying its filing of Consent <br /> Judgments in Minnesota state court memorializing the National Settlement Agreements. <br /> This provision will cease to apply upon the effective date of the Legislative Modification <br /> described above, if that date is prior to August 1, 2022. <br /> F. Effect of no statutory change by August 1, 2022. If the Legislative Modification <br /> described above does not take effect by August 1, 2022, the allocation between the <br /> Parties set forth in Section II.B shall be modified as follows: (i) 40% directly to the State <br /> Abatement Fund, and (ii) 60% to Local Abatement Funds. The Parties further agree to <br /> discuss potential amendment of this MOA if such legislation does not timely go into <br /> effect in accordance with this paragraph. <br /> G. Effect of later statutory change. If the Legislative Modification described above takes <br /> effect after August 1, 2022, the allocation between the Parties will be modified as <br /> follows: <br /> (i) 25%directly to the State Abatement Fund, and(ii) 75%to Local Abatement Funds. <br /> H. Effect of partial statutory change. If any legislative action otherwise modifies or <br /> diminishes the direct allocation of Opioid Settlement Funds to Participating Local <br /> Governments so that as a result the Participating Local Governments would receive less <br /> than 75 percent of the Opioid Settlement Funds (inclusive of amounts received by <br /> counties per statutory appropriation through the Minnesota Opiate Epidemic Response <br /> Fund), then the allocation set forth in Section II.B will be modified to ensure <br /> Participating Local Governments receive 75%of the Opioid Settlement Funds. <br /> I. Participating Local Governments receiving payments. The proportions set forth in <br /> Exhibit B provide for payments directly to: (i) all Minnesota counties; and (ii) all <br /> Minnesota cities that (a) have a population of more than 30,000, based on the United <br /> States Census Bureau's Vintage 2019 population totals, (b) have funded or otherwise <br /> managed an established health care or treatment infrastructure (e.g., health department or <br /> similar agency), or (c) have initiated litigation against AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal <br /> Health, McKesson, or Janssen as of December 3, 2021. <br /> J. Allocation of funds between Participating Local Governments. The Local Abatement <br /> Funds shall be allocated to Participating Local Governments in such proportions as set <br /> forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which is based <br /> upon the MDL Matter's Opioid Negotiation Class Model.' The proportions shall not <br /> change based on population changes during the term of the MOA. However, to the extent <br /> ' More specifically, the proportions in Exhibit B were created based on Exhibit G to the National <br /> Settlement Agreements, which in turn was based on the MDL Matter's allocation criteria. Cities <br /> under 30,000 in population that had shares under the Exhibit G default allocation were removed <br /> and their shares were proportionally reallocated amongst the remaining subdivisions. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.