Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br /> 138 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked Finance Director Hannah Lynch to share how the building and design 139 <br />process fall in line with the five-year plan. Finance Director Lynch discussed multiple funding 140 <br />sources assumed in the five-year plan for the Public Works facility which would ensure the cash 141 <br />flow supports the debt service on this facility. Mayor Rafferty noted everything the City is trying 142 <br />to do is to protect their interest rate. Finance Director. Finance Director Lynch confirmed. 143 <br /> 144 <br />Further discussion was held on the site of a new Public Works building. 145 <br /> 146 <br />Councilmember Stoesz spoke about the water/sewer issue at the current location and asked if the 147 <br />architect will help in site selection. Mr. Grochala did not anticipate any new site selection as the 148 <br />previous round focused back on utilizing the existing Public Works site and extending 149 <br />sewer/water or outside facilities. 150 <br /> 151 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked if there is opportunity for County leasing of space for storage of 152 <br />plows or extra equipment. Director Grochala noted it is something the City can explore and 153 <br />incorporate into the design process. 154 <br /> 155 <br />Councilmember Lyden inquired of the anticipated price point. Finance Director Lynch stated that 156 <br />many assumptions were built in to the five-year plan and explained the cost is anticipated at 157 <br />approximately $11,200,000 between multiple funding sources; she further noted that would have 158 <br />no tax impact though if costs come in higher the City may need to explore what tax levy would 159 <br />need to support this debt service. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Mayor Rafferty stated he would like to see this project move forward but noted concerns with the 162 <br />site. Director Grochala spoke about the evaluation of two sites, noting the City is somewhat 163 <br />limited due to space and location. 164 <br /> 165 <br />Mayor Rafferty would like to work with land the City currently owns. 166 <br /> 167 <br />Councilmember Stoesz commented he would appreciate creative thinking and perhaps consider 168 <br />utilization of space in the the administrative building rather than creating a new site, as that 169 <br />would be the best use of taxpayer money. 170 <br /> 171 <br />Mayor Rafferty thinks a public works facility is a standalone facility and those that work in the 172 <br />facility must be able to move in and out. He does not see that public work fits in at the City Hall 173 <br />location. He noted the importance of public works telling the architects what they need rather 174 <br />than the other way around. 175 <br /> 176 <br />Administrator Cotton explained the RFP (Request for Proposal) process noting the City could 177 <br />put that out and receive bids from different architectural firm. 178 <br /> 179 <br />Mayor Rafferty would like to move forward with finding 3-4 architectural firms and going 180 <br />through an interview process with those that have experience with public works. Director 181 <br />Grochala replied Staff can come back with some firms they would like to bring in and rough out 182 <br />the scope of services. 183