Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Stoesz inquired if there is adequate space in the proposed parking lot for school <br />buses to navigate. Planner Larsen advised that there are no anticipated concerns about school <br />buses as the lot was designed to support fire trucks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked of soil issues due to the neighboring gas station and the holding <br />ponds proposed next to the daycare and any safety concerns. Planner Larsen advised that the <br />applicant has done its due diligence and no soil contamination was found; further, that the <br />holding ponds will not have any standing water; rather the ponds will be infiltration areas. She <br />also noted that the proposed outdoor proposed play areas are fully fenced. She does not have any <br />concerns related to safety of the children at the daycare due to soil or the holding ponds. <br /> <br />Planner Larsen will bring these applications forward for Council approval at the June 12 regular <br />meeting. <br /> <br />3. 2024 Capital Budget Request <br /> <br />Community Development Director Michael Grochala provided Council information on the <br />City’s opportunity to submit a funding request for inclusion in Governor Walz’s 2024 budget. <br />Based on the recent focus of funding distribution, he suggested to Council bringing forward a <br />request to develop an inclusionary playground in the city; if the City’s request is granted, the city <br />would be required to provide a 50% local match. Director Grochala noted that the deadline for <br />Capital Budget Request submissions is June 16, 2023 so time is of the essence if Council wishes <br />to bring this request forward. <br /> <br />Council discussed the match obligation of the city and where those funds could come from. <br />Director Grochala said that has not yet been determined and can be discussed over the coming <br />months; options may include park dedication funds, an interfund loan, or levy. It was also <br />discussed that an application/request for this funding can be withdrawn in the future if it is <br />determined that the local match may be problematic. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ruhland inquired of using an existing park in need of updating rather than <br />establishing a new park location. Director Grochala proposed singling out existing city land to <br />create a destination, including land at Tower Park or Country Estates Park. <br /> <br />Councilmember Lyden expressed excitement about the possibility of getting the plans underway <br />for an inclusive park. He suggested that perhaps land at or near the Rookery is considered as <br />well. Mayor Rafferty said he is not in favor of that plan but is supportive of moving forward with <br />a request so that the planning can begin. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked how long the City would have to use the funds if received and <br />what would happen if the funding request was granted but local match funds were not available. <br />Director Grochala explained that he believes a period of four (4) years is allowed for use of the <br />funds if granted to the City. He also said that in order for the funding request to be granted, the <br />City would need to prove that the match funds are available. Councilmember Cavegn also asked <br />of annual park funding and whether match funds for an inclusionary park would impact the