My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/13/2023 P&Z Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2023
>
09/13/2023 P&Z Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 9:01:29 AM
Creation date
9/8/2023 8:56:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/13/2023
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />08/30/2023 <br />Page 2 <br />Glamos Wire Storage Expansion Engineering Review <br />Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) <br />Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt <br />Existing 18.98 30.11 58.70 Not provided <br />Proposed 17.22 26.86 51.29 Not provided <br />Comments: <br />1.The applicant shall clarify the proposed rim elevation of the pond OCS. The detail <br />shows an elevation of 910.4 and the drainage plan sheet shows 908.1. <br />2.The applicant shall revise the BMP design in the northwest corner of the basin. <br />Locating an inlet that flows over the OCS and into the basin will result in flow <br />shortcutting and potential long-term damage to the structure. It is recommended to <br />shift the inlet location, OCS, or both to avoid this risk. <br />3.The applicant shall revise the riprap shown on the plans to cover the surface down to <br />the normal water level of the pond. Current plans limit riprap to an elevation of 908, <br />leaving approximately 10’ of unarmored ground at risk of erosion from flows into the <br />basin. <br />a.It is also recommended that the NWL and 100-yr HWL footprint of the BMP <br />be shown on the plans. <br />4.As proposed, the swale routed to the inlet at the northwest corner of the pond flows <br />through a fence. The applicant shall revise the fence design at this location to ensure <br />flows can pass freely and without risk of clogging from debris. <br />•Water Supply <br />Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. <br />Comments: <br />1.We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the <br />proposed plan to verify fire protection <br />•Sanitary Sewer <br />Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. <br />•Transportation <br />Vehicle access will occur through the existing storage area south of the building. No <br />adverse traffic impacts are anticipated and a traffic study is not required. <br />Comments: <br />1.A vehicle access gate is shown on the northwest corner of the proposed lot, but it is <br />not evident how this gate will be used considering the proposed swale in that location <br />and lack of impervious for driving. The applicant shall clarify this gate design.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.