My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-02-2023 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
Searchable Packets
>
10-02-2023 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 1:52:55 PM
Creation date
10/3/2023 10:07:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/02/2033
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />•The product may contribute byproducts to surface and groundwater supplies as it <br />decomposes. The polyurethane that it is made of has hazardous decomposition <br />products. <br />•Use in easement areas and rights-of-way should be prohibited. These areas require <br />access for maintenance of utilities and management of stormwater systems and are <br />frequently disturbed. <br />•Examples of installations provided were for small portions of yards, not whole yards. <br />•Expected life span of the product is 15-20 years. At that time, the material must be <br />removed and landfilled. <br />The Environmental Board provided the following additional comments: <br />•Other alternative lawn types are available that are better choices for limiting water, <br />pesticide, and fertilizer use <br />•Hazardous byproducts leaching into ground and surface waters <br />•Hazardous byproducts when product is exposed to fire <br />•Soil health impacts <br />•Losing the water uptake and cooling effect of evapotranspiration from plants <br />•Impacts on resale value of homes <br />The Board voted 1 “no” for any use of the product and 3 “noes” for widespread use but may be <br />allowed in certain limited, clearly defined small areas such as high traffic or erosion areas. <br />City Engineer <br />The attached City Engineer’s Memo provides the following comments: <br />•Drainage and Infiltration Concerns-need more conclusive evidence. If product is going to <br />allowed in small applications, treat it as an impervious surface. Residential lots are <br />allowed up to 65% maximum impervious surface coverage. <br />o Additional comment: At the Planning & Zoning meeting, the recommendation to <br />treat it as an impervious surface caused too much confusion since the product is <br />pervious. Staff understands the product is pervious but was only recommending <br />it be treated as impervious as a way to limit the amount of synthetic grass <br />allowed on a property. Staff will suggest other ideas if directed to by Council. <br />•Unknown potential environmental and health impacts. <br />•Synthetic grass should not be allowed in drainage and utility easements due to potential <br />restoration costs as a result of future City utility maintenance and replacement <br />activities. <br />Planning & Zoning Board
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.