My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-01-2021 Park Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Minutes
>
2021 Minutes
>
09-01-2021 Park Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2023 12:43:25 PM
Creation date
10/20/2023 12:33:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Minutes
Meeting Date
09/01/2021
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Richard Jensen, Park Board Member, confirmed with DeGardner that as of right now <br />there is only $90,000 in funds to use to upgrade a park. DeGardner confirmed and added <br />that if Lino Park come in under budget there could be some funds extra however the Park <br />Board should plan on the $90,000. <br /> <br /> William Kusterman. Park Board Member, commented that the Park Board needs to <br />identify the real important needs and make the City Council aware of them. That they <br />need to try to make them understand what funds would be needed to make a real <br />difference. <br /> <br /> Clark Gooder, Park Board Member, did request to have Mike Hoffman, Parks Supervisor, <br />attend a park walk though in Ocotber or attend a Park Board Meeting dregarding the <br />needs of each park and the city. <br /> <br /> Kusterman commented that he remembered at one time the Park Board received Mike’s <br />assessment of each of the park and is looking to have that updated and provided again to <br />the Park Board. <br /> <br /> Zilka stated that there has to be a clear 5yr plan, 10yr plan, etc. Going year to year will <br />not cut it or make a significant difference. <br /> <br /> Huelman stated there is two folds. One, is to go back and take a look at the list of needs <br />that they have slowly been chipping away at. He suggest that the Park Board do a work <br />session where they can look at the list and re-prioritize it and then update the long term <br />financial plan. Two, is try to obtain more funding. <br /> <br /> After a lengthy discussion the Park Board decided to visit the following parks to review <br />and make assessments: City Hall Park, Marshan Park, Wenzel Farms Park, and <br />Shenandoah Park. <br /> <br />Park Board did discuss a dog park with-in the City. The logistics and spacing was <br />discussed. Abby Haworth, Park Board Member, stated it would be hard to consider <br />putting in a dog park at this time when they have some many parks and trails they need to <br />update that they are having a hard time funding. Kusterman stated he would go on <br />recorded opposing a dog park at this time. <br /> <br />At this time the Park Board will visit the parks and then work to compile a plan/list on <br />what needs to be done. <br /> <br /> <br />8. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. PARK SIGNAGE <br />Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director, stated that the need to update our park <br />identification signage has been discussed for several year. He pointed out that many of <br />the parks do not have any signage, and those that do have routed, wood type signs.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.