Laserfiche WebLink
also noted that the full reading of the ordinance was not done, it was just rattled <br /> off. <br /> RESULT: CARRIED [UNANIMOUS] <br /> MOVER: Cavegn <br /> SECONDER: Lyden <br /> AYES: Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz, Ruhland, Rafferty <br /> H. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance 11-23, Approving Land Sale TS Miller Co. <br /> Community Development Director Michael Grochala reviewed proposed ordinance 11-23 <br /> to convey 1.4 acres of land to Rice Industries and noted that the parcel in consideration <br /> is a stormwater holding pond. Rice Industries is looking at expansion on their existing site <br /> but their current parcel restricted this; conveyance of the parcel will allow the expansion <br /> to go forward. The parcel is currently off tax rolls. <br /> Director Grochala added that conveyance of the land will make that a taxable property; <br /> the City will retain a drainage and utility easement. Proposal is conveyance of $1 as the <br /> parcel itself is not buildable because it is still needed for drainage. <br /> Councilmember Cavegn noted that during the work session, there was a verbal offer to <br /> purchase the property for $1000. Director Grochala stated that the City would not <br /> consider that offer as the property is not for sale just for anyone; the City is looking for <br /> reuse of it for economic development purposes. He added that Council may take that <br /> offer into consideration but he does not believe the offer would be accepted as there is <br /> no building allowed on the parcel and it still needs to be maintained for stormwater <br /> management purposes. To convey it to Rice, there is a citywide benefit in economic <br /> development. Director Grochala also clarified that the tax revenue that will be generated <br /> will far supersede any sale revenue from the property. <br /> Mayor Rafferty accepted comments from the public: <br /> Ms. Catherine Decker, 614 Pine Street, said we are currently considering an increase in <br /> the budget of 10%,that part of the explanation of the increase was to buy new firetrucks <br /> to service people who are on well water, and the City is planning to build a new water <br /> treatment plant which the people who are on well water won't be use. She also said that <br /> she doesn't think that the people who are on well water asked for fire trucks; people on <br /> well water are being charged for water they're not using and fire service they don't want <br /> to use when the City is selling wetlands that go for over$100,000 per acre for one dollar. <br /> She asked how are we not being good financial stewards in our community. We should <br /> be charging fair market value and be good stewards. <br /> 9 <br />