My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
20231025 EB Meeting Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
20231025 EB Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2023 7:20:45 PM
Creation date
11/30/2023 10:33:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
10/25/2023
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 29,2023 <br /> Environmental Board <br /> Page 2 <br /> Mr. Nelson, Environmental Coordinator,presented the staff report. <br /> M/I Homes submitted a land use application for a Planned Unit Development, which <br /> includes 108 single-family residential lots on the approximately 59.3 acres site. <br /> Approximately 30 acres of open space will be provided. <br /> Mr. Nelson had seven recommendations for the Board: <br /> 1. A new rare plant and animal survey must be completed for the pro <br /> • Ms. Nelson asked who identifies a rare plant or animal. Nelson explained that <br /> the applicant will have to hire a qualified company t erfo he surveys. <br /> 2. If rare species are found on site, design layout should be iseh to a mpac <br /> to these species. <br /> 3. If rare species are found on site and impacts are u oida lude featu that <br /> minimize impacts (ex: buffers around rare plant loca ns fo y that can be <br /> preserved, surmountable curbs to facilitate B ding's le movement, <br /> restoration of undisturbed project areas). its y be required for any <br /> impacts to rare species. <br /> 4. Coordinate with the Rare Plant Res gr ontact Taylor at Anoka <br /> Conservation District) to allow for ansport o rare plan s for which impact is <br /> unavoidable to a donor site, such as ollan's Pa Wetland Bank in Lino Lakes. <br /> 5. A tree survey and inventor must be completed. <br /> • Ms. Holmes asked if there are modificati that could be made to the proposal <br /> for better retention of the older trees. Mr. Nelson explained there would be trees <br /> in enhancement areas and depending on the area; they have to provide a certain <br /> amoun'to of trees proportionally to the amount of trees removed. Mr. Nelson also <br /> suggested having more conversation on this when the tree survey is submitted. <br /> • eier expressed Ancerns for what would happen if the private lot <br /> ers r ove mitigation trees. Mr. Nelson replied that mitigation trees would be <br /> pla protected easement areas and outlots rather than on the single-family <br /> lots. <br /> 6. Preserve as many trees as possible, particularly along the west and north <br /> perimeters*,Fece <br /> iM to provide buffer and screening between project site and <br /> existing reI lots. Tree protection zones in accordance with the City Tree <br /> Prote 'on Detail must be shown for all trees that are being preserved. <br /> These s must be shown on the Tree Preservation Plan and Grading Plans <br /> submittr <br /> t the Preliminary Plat phase. <br /> 7. Consider restoration of upland and wetland areas as a community benefit. <br /> • Chair Sullivan asked what would be examples of restoration work in upland and <br /> wetland areas. Mr. Nelson explained that sometimes the developer would receive <br /> wetland credit if they do restoration, or sometimes they create wetland on-site. If <br /> they were to do restoration work such as invasive species management in upland <br /> areas that would provide community benefit. <br /> DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.