My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-13-2023 Council Meeting Packet - Amended
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
Searchable Packets
>
11-13-2023 Council Meeting Packet - Amended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2023 4:34:21 PM
Creation date
11/30/2023 4:29:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/13/2023
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the proposed development <br />must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed <br />development or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. <br />6. The traffic generated from a proposed development shall not require City street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, <br />the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street <br />deficiencies. <br />7. The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must <br />be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and <br />a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan <br />must determine traffic generated by the proposed development project, how this traffic <br />contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must <br />examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other <br />jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br />The proposed agritourism tree farm meets LOS requirements. CSAH 32/CR J (Ash Street) is an A- <br />Minor Expander Arterial road and has structural capacity to accommodate traffic from the <br />proposed development. The traffic generated from a proposed development does not require <br />City street improvements. <br /> <br />(e) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water <br />supply. <br />The proposed agritourism tree farm does not require a water supply. <br /> <br />(f) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate or safe sanitary <br />sewer system. <br />The proposed agritourism tree farm does not require a sanitary sewer supply. On-site temporary <br />restrooms will be provided. <br /> <br />(g) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of <br />City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. <br />The proposed agritourism tree farm does not require City funds. <br /> <br />(h) Fire prevention and fighting equipment acceptable to the Board of Fire <br />Underwriters and City Council shall be readily available when any activity involving the handling <br />or storage of flammable or explosive materials is carried on. <br />161
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.