Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Board <br /> January 31,2024 <br /> Page 3 <br /> grant funding to RCWD's discretion as to how it would be spent. She was also opposed <br /> to residents paying increased taxes for the project. <br /> Ms. Holmes clarified that outreach programs are a key mechanism for residents to <br /> understand the importance of the treatment and have accurate information. She also asked <br /> if the grant required a match for the project. <br /> Mr. Kocian replied yes, 10%matching funds are required from RCWD and/or partners. <br /> Mr. Schwartz asked what percentage of the total project cost will be allocated towards the <br /> treatment project, contractors, and materials. <br /> Mr. Kocian replied the vast majority of the cost wArld towards the alum application. <br /> Ms. Nelson asked how badly of a problem Eurasian Watermilfoil is and if it does show <br /> up after the alum treatment. <br /> Mr. Kocian said Eurasian Watermilfoil has not been as much a problem in recent years, <br /> but pondweed, which is an invasive species, has been a problem in lakes. Mr. Kocian <br /> clarified that the Lake Association collaborated with RCWD for the past 3-4 years to map <br /> and treat pondweed and other invasive species. <br /> Ms. Nelson clarified since RCWD and the Lake Association monitored Eurasian <br /> Watermilfoil, then the main concern for residents would be the costs because there are <br /> already steps being taken to try to control invasive exotic water plants. <br /> Mr. Stowe replied that as a resident he would be paying the 3%through the contribution <br /> of Lino Lakes, Anoka County and RCWD. He also expressed that the Lake Association <br /> should be the only partner for the project. <br /> Mr. Schwartz clarified that whether or not the Board makes a motion to approve the <br /> project the project would still progress. He noted that the Environmental Board is not the <br /> best forum for discussing the financial and tax implications of the project. <br /> Ms. Cavegn agreed with Mr. Schwartz. She continued to say that the role of the <br /> Environmental Board is to proceed with what is most environmentally responsible. She <br /> also suggested bringing financial concerns up to City Council as the Environmental <br /> Board does not have input on financial aspects. <br /> Motion was made by Chair Sullivan and seconded by Ms. Nelson. Motion carried 7—0. <br /> B. 2024 Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List <br /> Mr. Nelson, Environmental Coordinator,presented the staff report. <br /> DRAFT MINUTES <br />