Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 2, 2018 <br />DRAFT <br /> 5 <br />noted that a convenience store proposal has been broached in the area. The council did 168 <br />not express interest in such a development. Mayor Reinert remarked that he envisioned 169 <br />something on the site that would serve as a gateway to the city. Community 170 <br />Development Director Grochala noted the master plan prepared in 2007. The council 171 <br />asked about an estimate of the cost for WSB & Associates to prepare plans and 172 <br />specifications. Staff explained that they would investigate costs further. 173 <br /> 174 <br />The council heard from residents of the area. Concern about noise and closeness to 175 <br />residential properties remains a concern. The mayor remarked that it’s the council’s job 176 <br />make sure that developments that occur in the city are appropriate to the city. 177 <br />9. NE Drainage Area Land Acquisition – Community Development Director 178 <br />Grochala reported. His report relates to the big channel project. The watershed district 179 <br />has the project under review. He’s seeking council direction to get a proposal from WSB 180 <br />to move on land acquisition. This would be a corridor acquisition and potentially 181 <br />acquisition relating to remnants. The Lennar project will be somewhat dependent on the 182 <br />project. Council Member Rafferty asked how the city will recoup costs – Mr. Grochala 183 <br />explained fees. 184 <br /> 185 <br />The council concurred with staff’s request; Mayor Reinert asked about the wisdom of 186 <br />going out for bids for something like this. Community Development Director Grochala 187 <br />remarked that the city has pretty much stuck with WSB, for different reasons such as they 188 <br />are already involved in the projects making their services generally more efficient. Mr. 189 <br />Grochala explained his process that includes overview of the city engineer (already on 190 <br />contract). 191 <br />10. Review Regular Agenda 192 <br /> 193 <br />Regarding the consent agenda, Council Member Stoesz remarked that the expenditure list 194 <br />can be difficult to read as far as how all the expenditures relate to the actual city budget. 195 <br />For instance, how do the expenditures fit into the overall line items in the budget that 196 <br />they represent? Mayor Reinert asked Administrator Karlson what he uses to follow the 197 <br />budget as a manager. Mr. Karlson explained the budgeting document that each 198 <br />department director receives. The council concurred that they’d like that made 199 <br />available. 200 <br /> 201 <br />Council Member Rafferty asked questions about expenditures to Century College for 202 <br />training (law enforcement and fire). Public Safety Director Swenson remarked that one 203 <br />is an annual training situation; for people that can’t get into that class, they may be sent 204 <br />to other classes. 205 <br /> 206 <br />Council Member Rafferty noted expenses related to utility bill envelopes and asked about 207 <br />how to reduce those costs – is there a cheaper way to provide bills. He also asked about 208 <br />range expenses for police shooting activity. And he asked about petty cash in the Police 209