My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-26-2018 Council Meeting Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2018
>
02-26-2018 Council Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2024 2:25:51 PM
Creation date
3/2/2024 12:02:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />February 5, 2018 <br />Q4: Do cities and townships have an unfair advantage in the decision making process if a JPA WMO <br />representing cities is attending meetings as well as city/township representatives themselves ? <br />A: As part of the metro-area pilot, the local governments within a county geographic area are responsible <br />for deciding the decision making structure they will use. Participants are encouraged to select an equitable <br />process. <br />Q5: What documentation is required by BWSR to demonstrate that a local government is or is not <br />participating in the Watershed-based Funding pilot? <br />A: The communication or invitation sent by the group facilitator for the convene meetings should <br />include a deadline for responding to the invitation and a statement indicating that no response will be <br />interpreted as declining to participate. <br />If a local government has decided to participate in the convene meetings, they can accept meeting <br />invitations or provide a written acceptance to the group facilitator stating they wish to participate in the <br />process. <br />If a local government has decided not to participate in a collaborative process, they can decline <br />invitations to scheduled meetings or provide a written indication to the group facilitator stating they do <br />not wish to participate in the process. <br />Q6: Who will the invitation to participate be sent to? <br />A: For cities and townships, the invitation should be sent to the person with responsibility for the local <br />water plan, with the city administrator or township clerk copied. For the watershed districts and JPA <br />WMOs, the invitation should be sent to the organization administrator or the board chair if there is not <br />an administrator. For SWCDs, the invitation should be sent to the district manager. <br />Q7: What documentation is required by BWSR to demonstrate that a local government is <br />participating in the collaborative process for the Watershed-based Funding pilot? <br />A: Due to local matching requirement involved, a local government wishing to participate in a <br />collaborative process, should follow their own procedures and policies regarding receiving state grant <br />funding. <br />This may include a board resolution or motion acknowledging the intent to move forward with identified <br />projects and providing necessary match. <br />Q8: What documentation is required by BWSR to demonstrate a collaborative partnership amongst <br />multiple local governments within a county geographic area for the Watershed-based Funding pilot? <br />A: As part of the metro-area pilot, the local governments within a county geographic area need to <br />decide how funds would be allocated amongst the participating partners. If partners will work <br />independently of one another, the local governments that will directly receive funding should have the <br />board’s approval per resolution of accepting state funds and providing the necessary matching dollars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.