Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 5, 2018 <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br /> 47 <br />Ms. Lindahl pointed out on a map the mixed use that was included in the last update and 48 <br />those that would be new in the proposed plan (a map comparison from 2030 Plan and 49 <br />2040 proposed plan was included). She also pointed out that, in her experience, 50 <br />developers don’t actually prefer a mixed use scenario (they want the quickest path to 51 <br />approval and that designation doesn’t necessarily provide that). 52 <br /> 53 <br />Council Member Rafferty asked about the request that’s been received on the Waldoch 54 <br />property. Mr. Grochala responded that the request relates to moving up in staging. 55 56 Ms. Lindahl then reviewed how staff proposes that the 2040 Comp Plan update is 57 <br />scheduled to move forward to the implementation stage. Staff is requesting now that they 58 <br />get confirmation of the ten existing mixed use guided areas and the two new proposed 59 <br />mixed use areas. 60 <br /> 61 <br />Mayor Reinert said he’d like to eliminate mixed use and discuss a more specific 62 <br />designation. He doesn’t like to see questions marks on the map to avoid future surprises 63 <br />for the council and residents. 64 <br /> 65 <br />Community Development Director Grochala noted the table included in the land use plan; 66 <br />for each mixed use area, there is identification and further specifics, including a vision for 67 <br />each of the areas. 68 <br /> 69 <br />Council Member Manthey suggested that he has a similar concern about what could 70 <br />occur. For instance what about acreage that remains after development of a portion of a 71 <br />mixed use area – what could happen there? He asked if the city will meet its density 72 <br />requirements for the Met Council if changes are made in the Plan now. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Director Grochala noted the figure of 3-5 units per acre and that he always keeps that as 75 <br />low as possible. Also noted is that density is calculated only on areas with sewer. 76 <br /> 77 <br />The mayor asked if the City will have to go higher density because of what exists now. 78 <br />Ms. Lindahl explained that current low density (that isn’t changing) doesn’t have to 79 <br />count. The density calculation is based on moving forward. 80 <br /> 81 <br />Mayor Reinert said he’s asked for information and wants to use that for further study. 82 <br />His gut tells him the plan is moving toward more density and he doesn’t approve. 83 <br /> 84 <br />Council Member Stoesz asked if the City can change designations in the future or add a 85 <br />new designation based on their decision at that time. Director Grochala explained how 86 <br />zoning can be changed by ordinance, including by creating a mixed use based on the 87 <br />specifics of the site. The comp plan is intended only to guide. 88 <br /> 89 <br />Mayor Reinert said he isn’t comfortable with 650 acres being a free for all. Director 90 <br />Grochala pointed out that a big part of that is the Watermark land and then the Winter 91 <br />property. 92