My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-25-2018 Council Meeting Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2018
>
06-25-2018 Council Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2024 2:25:53 PM
Creation date
3/2/2024 12:06:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />will be addressed in the future, no further analysis over what is included in the current <br />Traffic Study would be required. Comment noted. <br /> <br />6. Street A and Street C shall be 32 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb. The plans <br />currently show back of curb. As discussed, 32’ back to back is acceptable. <br />7.The cul-du-sac widths can be reduced to 28 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb. <br />Cul-de-sacs have been updated to 28’ back to back. As discussed, 28’ back to <br />back is acceptable. <br />Cul-de-sacs shall be 30’ back to back. <br />Cul-de-sac widths updated to 30’ back to back. <br />8.The ACD 10-22-32 crossing shall be wide enough to accommodate the road, a 5 foot <br />buffer and an 8.5 foot wide trail with 4:1 side slope tapers. <br />Ditch crossing updated. Street C extended to the northern property line. <br />9.The future trail extension along 10-22-32 should be relocated to the same crossing as <br />Street C. Thus there would only be one ditch crossing. <br />Ditch crossing updated. <br />10.There is a future trail planned along the north side of Main Street. The plans shall <br />include the grading for this trail. This will likely also require hydrant relocation. <br />Grading for a future trail has been incorporated. Hydrants will be relocated at the <br />time of trail construction. <br />11.The applicant shall remove the trees identified in the Landscaping Plan from the sight <br />line triangle of Street A and Main Street (CSAH) 14. Revised per city comments. <br />12.A bituminous trail is recommended through this site. As noted in the wetland section of <br />this report the proposed location, along Lots 1-6 Block 3, is within the 25 foot buffer and <br />should be relocated. The proposed trail location is allowed by RCWD rules and <br />will therefore not be relocated. According to RCWD Rule F 6(e)(7)(iii) – Buffer may <br />enclose a linear surface for non-motorized travel no more than 10 feet in width. The <br />linear surface must be at least 25 feet from the wetland edge. The area of the linear <br />surface will not be eligible for replacement credit. For projects proposing non- <br />motorized travel no more than 10 feet in width, the linear surface may be reduced to less <br />than 25 feet from the wetland edge based on compelling need and a TEP <br />recommendation to the District in support that the wetland protection afforded is <br />reasonable given the circumstances. Per Kjolhaug Environmental Services. <br />13.The proposed sidewalks were reviewed. Pedestrian curb ramps will be required, and <br />reviewed with the final construction plans. Comment noted. <br />14.Street C temporary cul du sac should have continual curb and gutter and temporary <br />paved eyebrows. The storm sewer will need to be adjusted. <br />Temporary cul-de-sac and storm sewer has been updated. <br />15. The Revised Traffic Study provided a summary of the Level of Service for each <br />intersection movement for CSAH 14 and Street A. It concludes that in the build <br />2030 and build 2030+ conditions the southbound left turn would operate at a LOS F. <br />Are the recommended improvements discussed on page 9 of the Study included with <br />the build analysis? If not, what is the change in Level of Service with these <br />improvements? What is the Level of Service for the interim year (see comment #1)? <br />What is the Level of Service in the no-build condition? <br />This comment was not addressed in the May 17, 2018 revised Traffic Study. Following <br />discussion with the developers engineer an updated revised Traffic Study, dated June 4, <br />2018 was prepared which did address the comment. The Study concluded that a <br />southbound right turn lane would be needed at the CSAH 14 and Street A intersection. It
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.