Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 10, 2024 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />going to be addressed. She feels it is a safety issue where they are crossing. Ms. Kufner <br />also questioned the possibility of increased traffic in the future. <br /> <br />Chris Kufner, 6606 Wild Turkey Trail, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Kufner thought after <br />having a conversation with the Mayor, he got the impression that the plant would be set <br />lower on the property but this is not shown in the rendering. He said he would like to <br />see it also set further back on the property if that is a possibility. He added screening on <br />the property would be appreciated to decrease noise. <br /> <br />Lisa Grone, 6624 Wild Turkey Trail, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Ms. Grone wanted to know <br />why the parcel was being rezoned and why they did not select the area near the water <br />tower for the water treatment plant. <br /> <br />Mark Braun, 6625 Wild Turkey Trail, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Braun questioned if the <br />existing land behind the water treatment location would remain open land or would it <br />be used for a housing development. He also wondered if it would affect the runoff with <br />the Rice Creek Watershed District going into the wetland across the street. <br /> <br />Jack Burch, 6572 White Oak Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55038. Mr. Burch wanted to know <br />how the water flow is going to work the water towers to the water treatment plant and <br />back to the water towers. <br /> <br />Marcella Raine, 1205 Chokecherry Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55038. Ms. Raine wanted to <br />know what the treatment plant would look like from 12th Avenue. <br /> <br />Charles Grafstrom, 6495 White Oak Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55038. Mr. Grafstrom asked <br />if there would be any hazardous chemicals that could catch on fire at the plant. <br /> <br />Gloria Pederson, 6658 Ruffed Grouse Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Ms. Pederson <br />requested more environmental information due to the creek that runs through the <br />property. She also said Ms. Larsen stated that property value would not be impacted <br />due to the water treatment plant and wanted to know if research has been done by <br />anyone other than realtors. She wanted to see the reports and not just take the City’s <br />word for it. <br /> <br />Mr. Kohler moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth. <br />The public hearing was closed at 7:07 p.m. <br />