My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-26-2024 City Council Agenda Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-26-2024 City Council Agenda Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2024 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
8/23/2024 3:47:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/26/2024
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes -16- July 8, 2024 <br />Steve 6225 Red Maple Lane, asked if the current individual property well can be maintained <br />after this project is complete. He stated that he would like to continue using his well for <br />watering the garden, etc. He also asked how this improvement would impact property values <br />and taxes. <br />Robert Holdan 6307 Maple Lane, asked how long the project was going to take and for an <br />overview of the project schedule. <br />The City Engineer stated that she would put the schedule on the website. <br />Jill Butcher 6339 Red Maple Lane, asked if there were any programs to assist with the cost of <br />the assessments. <br />Motin to Close the Public Hearing at 8:42 p.m. <br />RESULT: CARRIED [UNANIMOUS] <br />MOVER: Stoesz <br />SECONDER: Ruhland <br />AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lynde, Ruhland and Stoesz <br />The City Engineer provided responses to the questions raised during the public hearing. <br />Regarding the trees in the right-of-way those will be evaluated, including the root systems to <br />determine if they need to be removed at all. However, if they are in the right-of-way then the <br />City has the right to remove the trees without compensation. This will be discussed further at <br />the neighborhood meeting as well. Regarding determining if a septic system is compliant, the <br />City does not require a point of sale inspection, however, a home buyer may as part of a <br />purchase agreement. This may also be part of a building project requirement. Regarding future <br />development projections, the area to the south of the project area could see development in <br />the near future, however, that would not impact the amount of the proposed assessments <br />today. Regarding the continued use of a working well on the property, the owner can continue <br />to use that. Regarding the impact on property values and taxes, the County Assessor <br />determines property values, the assessment value may or may not be recorded directly by the <br />County Assessor. The City Engineer reviewed the project timeline. Regarding financial <br />assistance with paying the assessment cost, the assessments can be paid up front or over <br />several years as a tax assessment. Anoka County had a finance program for low-income <br />properties in the past and could be contacted for current program information. <br />Councilmember Ruhland stated that the FHA loan program requires that a well and septic <br />system be inspected in order to qualify for a loan, however, a traditional loan does not require <br />an inspection on its own. Anoka County also has a deferred assessment program for seniors. <br />The Council discussed the average water and sewer costs for a family of four. <br />The Community Development Director stated that he would post the average utility rates to the <br />project page of the website for the information of the property owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.