My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-09-24 - City Council Agenda Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
Searchable Packets
>
09-09-24 - City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2024 2:17:26 PM
Creation date
9/9/2024 2:10:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/09/2024
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes -11- June 24, 2024 <br /> <br />Mr. Dovolis said that as the Council has seen from previous meetings, Madinah Lakes is a <br />quality development with plans that exceed the standards of the community, so they are very <br />proud of what they are proposing. He said they want to work with the city, using the tools the <br />city has ready. There is no need for the excess ordinance that's been recommended at this <br />moment, because the foundation which it covers is already in place. <br />Matt Duffy, 7760 France Avenue S., Bloomington, requested that the letter he submitted to the <br />Community Development Director be entered into the public record. He stated that he has <br />been part of AUAR planning processes in the past. He believes involving those interested in <br />development projects in the process is most effective. He noted that it will take two <br />construction seasons to complete the project as it is and if a moratorium is implemented it will <br />take four seasons. <br />Sarah Shahid, 12724 Leyte Street NE, Blaine, stated that the moratorium is unfair, unjust and <br />highly targeted. The Robertson sod farm has utility staging at the southern property line. It's <br />slated for development in 2025, and the entrance out from Blaine on the main street is already <br />planned by Anoka County. She stated that the Master Plan and the AUAR are not excuses for a <br />moratorium. It has been reported by city staff that while water is a concern, this proposed <br />development can still be supported, especially due to the lower-than-expected development <br />over the last few years in Lino Lakes. She noted that 434 units don't go up overnight. It usually <br />takes three to four years to do that once the construction starts. <br />Resident of 1304 Vera Cruz, Brooklyn Park, stated that he is a former Lino Lakes resident and <br />that he is also speaking on behalf of friends that live in Lino Lakes, noting that they are also <br />business owners. He said that placing a moratorium on this project means that you don't want <br />to welcome new people want to move to Lino Lakes. In 2016, the City approved a Planned Unit <br />Development with 871 Single Family units, and two other developers presented this in 2016 <br />through 2022 and it didn’t face opposition or moratorium. So, a common misconception people <br />think that Madinah Lakes is only for the Muslims. It's not it is for people of all races, beliefs, <br />backgrounds. <br />Asad Zaman, 1608 Como Avenue, St. Paul, stated that he has a few questions relevant to this <br />moratorium. One, if water is one of the two reasons for this moratorium, then why are you not <br />including all residential construction in the whole city? Question number two, he searched for <br />the words master plan in the 2040 Comp Plan. And it came up with 51 instances of those words <br />being used. If Master Planning is one of the two reasons for this moratorium, please tell us how <br />many times a Master Plan has been produced on a piece of land in the city. And how many of <br />those times was a moratorium imposed? Furthermore, does the city intend to impose a <br />moratorium for every future Master Plan mentioned in this Comp Plan. How many times has <br />the AUAR process been conducted, and how many of them were accompanied by a <br />moratorium? He stated that his community would appreciate answers to these questions, <br />because that will help them decide if this moratorium is fair or if it's unfairly targeting their <br />community. <br />Zaman stated that when the public comment was opened the topics considered germane to the <br />discussion were reviewed, however, Councilmember Ruhland was allowed to speak to those <br />issues. He said that he was willing to take the Council at face value that the moratorium is not
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.