My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-07-24 - Council Agenda Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
Searchable Packets
>
10-07-24 - Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 3:05:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2024 2:44:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/07/2024
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: <br />Connor Mattioli <br />To: <br />Katie Larsen <br />Subject: <br />Re: October 7, 2024 — City Council Work Session Agenda and Staff Report — ZOTA Home Occupation Permits <br />Date: <br />Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:47:55 PM <br />Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. <br />Good Afternoon, Katie; thank you for sending this update! <br />I have a question, as I am not completely satisfied with the verbiage of the amendment and <br />what is going forward, as it is unclear. Currently, as this proposal is continuing, this provision <br />would not allow me to test any firearm I manufacture since I would not be able to work with <br />ammunition. I believe what the zoning board was mainly concerned with was the <br />manufacturing of ammunition; would it be possible to consider having the text read the <br />following to clarify this provision? <br />14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for <br />service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives; or manufacturing <br />of ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be <br />permitted as a home occupation. <br />The main reason for this concern would be, as a private citizen, would it be permissible to take <br />a firearm that I manufacture to a range and test it? If so, why would I be able to do this without <br />being covered by my business insurance? Or would the testing of any firearm, unless sold to a <br />private parry, not be allowed even at a legal firing range? <br />To summarize, my main question is, would it be possible to have this text addition considered <br />before the end of this amendment at this point, or would I need to wait until the proposed <br />change has finished and then submit a subsequent amendment proposal? <br />Thank you in advance, <br />Connor Mattioli <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.