Laserfiche WebLink
from the project is significant when viewed in connection with other contributions <br />to the cumulative potential effect; the degree to which the project complies with <br />approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the cumulative <br />potential effect; and the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from <br />the project; <br />C. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by <br />ongoing public regulatory authority. The RGU may rely only on mitigation <br />measures that are specific and that can be reasonably expected to effectively <br />mitigate the identified environmental impacts of the project; and <br />D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a <br />result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or <br />the project proposer, including other EISs. <br />Section 5. Findings of Fact of the attached response document provides the City's findings of <br />fact and addresses each of the above referenced criteria. Section 6. Record of Decision <br />concludes that an EIS is not required. <br />Representatives from the project proposer and WSB & Associates, the City Engineer, will be <br />present at the meeting to address any questions from the board. Staff is requesting the board <br />review and comment on the response document. Any comments received from the board will be <br />forwarded to the City Council for consideration. <br />REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION <br />Approve Record of Decision Making a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental <br />Impact Statement for the North Oaks Mixed Use Development. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />• Response to comments, findings of fact, and record of decision <br />• Resolution NO.25-12 <br />