Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />ITEM NO. 9 <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director <br />WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 <br />TOPIC: Special Assessment Senior Citizen Deferral <br />BACKGROUND <br />Minnesota Statutes Chapter 435.193 allows cities to provide a hardship assessment deferral <br />provided standards are adopted establishing guidelines for determining the existence of <br />hardship. City Code section 303.10 allows for the City Council to defer payment of special <br />assessments on homestead property owned by a person that is 65 years of age or older or <br />retired by virtue of permanent and total disability. The deferment is subject to certain income - <br />related conditions. To be eligible a property owner must meet the following income -related <br />requirements: <br />1) The owner's shall not have an annual gross income in excess of Section 8, low-income <br />limits in effect at the time of the application. This number is set annually for the metro <br />area. <br />2) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the <br />applicant shall not have gross assets (excluding the homestead property) in excess of <br />$50,000. <br />3) The Assessor's Market Value of the applicant's homestead parcel shall not exceed <br />$60,000. <br />Items 2 & 3 above have not been adjusted since 1983. The code allows for the Council, on the <br />recommendation of the City Administrator, to adjust the asset and market value requirements <br />by motion. However, staff are proposing deletion of the gross assets and market value <br />requirements. This would leave the low-income limits that are regionally established each <br />year ($78,250 for a two -person household). Alternatively, some cities use a formula <br />determination based on the annual assessment amount as a percentage of annual gross <br />income. For example, the hardship determination could be established when the annual <br />assessment rate exceeds 2% of total adjusted gross incomes. This would allow for a more <br />flexible policy based on assessment amounts. <br />